This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson
    Moderator Edit: This post has been removed by a Moderator
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Dear John ,
    it is unfortunate  that the title of publication Engineering’s reputation damaged by outdated ‘white male’ stereotype, says IET “ By Jonathan Wilson   Published Friday, November 24, 2017, used in your mail implies  that Jo Foster the IET’s diversity and inclusion manager agrees with it .  Her statement says  “These outdated and fixed ideas of what a ‘typical engineer’ looks like are damaging to the industry, especially when the significant shortage of engineers in the UK is posing a serious threat to the economy”. Nothing about colour . You surely must agree that there are lack of engineers in England regardless  age, sex  and race including colour, ethnic or national origin .
    I do not think that it is proper to conclude any discussion by strongly pressing own point on any subjects . Probably there are not identical routes to the chartered membership for all of the IET members. And everybody included the IET members, council and trustees  should feel free to express their opinion without being strongly criticised .
    I very much agree with the opinion that a lot of members did not respond to  your different statements  because they did not want to be offended or ridiculed .
    I will quote the mail of  Barry Brookes who wrote : I have resisted responding to your monologues, despite various provocative statements and allegations, in the interests of tolerating free speech and the hope that, somewhere, there might be a good idea worth pursuing or a serious wrong that needs putting right.  However, you have reached the insulting and probably libellous  stage of your campaign complaining about fake information by employing your own fake and rude allegations.
    Whatever legitimate causes you might wish to advocate are never going to be considered because of your technique of insulting the organisation to which you belong and the personal attacks on the elected volunteers who strive to do their best, pro bono, for the good of our Institution and our profession.
    I suggest that you either apologise and withdraw these insults, or join another organisation which is more willing to tolerate your approach.”
    I and others IET members very much agree with Barry’s statement and I think you could learn from it how to engage in public professional discussions.
    I wish you and all members expressing opinions on the forum  A  VERY  HAPPY  AND SUCCESSFUL  NEW  YEAR  2018 .
    Best regards
    Grazyna

     


  • We are now locking this discussion topic for any further replies.


    We welcome and encourage constructive and civil debate amongst users of our online community however, to remind you once again, use of the community is subject to Terms and Conditions of use and anyone repeatedly breaching those terms may find their access to the community suspended or removed indefinitely.


    We also encourage all users to report innappropriate or offensive content to the moderation team by using the 'Report' flag you will find beneath individual comments/replies.


    Lisa