Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 17 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1766 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

S.P.D.s and Populated Consumer Units.

Zoomup
Are new populated consumer units with S.P.D.s fitted designed to mainly protect the sensitive electronic equipment downstream of the S.P.D.s WITHIN THE CONSUMER UNIT? Is that the makers' MAIN intention as R.C.D.s, R.C.B.Os and other sensitive electronic devices can be damaged by Voltage surges, as compared to basic protective devices like wire or cartridge fuses or more basic M.C.B.s?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OuirPKoY0c


Z.
  • 0

    whjohnson:

    It might help if these things actually worked! I know this is a AFD rather than a SPD but the jury is still out as far as I am concerned. Here's part 1. Parts 2 & 3 are as equally illuminating.




    I don't think its fair to compare SPDs and AFDDs. SPDs are conceptually simple: if the voltage exceeds some limit, apply a short using e.g. a hefty thyristor. AFDDs have to monitor HF patterns in the current and subjectively decide which ones are normal (power-on switch spark, sparky brushes on a motor, electronic dimming etc) and which ones are a heat-generating arc fault. Which is hard to get right.

  • 0
    Apparently SPDs don't protect sensitive circuits on the secondary side of an isolation transformer, although the transformer itself supposedly provides some protection. Since most of the sensitive electronics usually lies after secondary winding one does wonder if these things are actually of any practical value.
  • 0
    Well we are using more electronic devices these days and they are more vunerable to discharge etc.

    So do we try or is it worth it? risk assesss makes sense then act accordingly.


    Years back an electronics teacher stated that for some uses CMOS etc was not used and TTL favoured because they were less suseptable.

    He pointed out thaf if, for instance, Russia set off a nuke in the air over our troops then the tanks etc would prob still function even though the soldiers inside them would have perished.
  • 0

    whjohnson:

    Apparently SPDs don't protect sensitive circuits on the secondary side of an isolation transformer, although the transformer itself supposedly provides some protection. Since most of the sensitive electronics usually lies after secondary winding one does wonder if these things are actually of any practical value.




     

    But the sensitive electronics won't do much if the power supply has blown.
  • 0

    ebee:

    Years back an electronics teacher stated that for some uses CMOS etc was not used and TTL favoured because they were less suseptable.

    He pointed out thaf if, for instance, Russia set off a nuke in the air over our troops then the tanks etc would prob still function even though the soldiers inside them would have perished.




    The planes were even more of a problem. A magnetic pulse could cause all the US planes (and NATO US built planes) to fall out the sky but the Russians didn't have semiconductor technology in their planes and still used valves....

  • 0

    Simon Barker:




    whjohnson:

    Apparently SPDs don't protect sensitive circuits on the secondary side of an isolation transformer, although the transformer itself supposedly provides some protection. Since most of the sensitive electronics usually lies after secondary winding one does wonder if these things are actually of any practical value.




     

    But the sensitive electronics won't do much if the power supply has blown.



    The thing is, would such devices be quick eniough to prevent a spike being induced in the secondary before the electronics on the south side of that were fried?




     

  • 0

    whjohnson:

    The thing is, would such devices be quick eniough to prevent a spike being induced in the secondary before the electronics on the south side of that were fried?




    Well they're usually semiconductor based, so can be extremely fast. For example, type 2's are tested against a waveform that reaches it's peak in 8 microsecs. The main thing that will affect their usefulness is the length of the leads from the SPD to the points where the circuit is "tapped into" due to the inductance of the leads.

Community Rules & Guidelines