This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Ring Main Joint Box

A kitchen worktop twin S,O, is to be relocated horizontally by about 60cm. 

The ring final cct (RFC) is cabled in buried T&E and the galv' steel back-box is flushed into the plaster/brick wall.

The RFC T&E extension cabling will be buried under plaster, covered in plastic capping along the horizontal  prescribed zone. Visually, it would be reasonable for an electrician to be aware that the route may contain cable(s).

The circuit is RCD protected.

The intent is touse insulated crimp and double insulating tape the jointed cables within the existing box to achieve a maintenance free connection, A 2mm thick (fabricated) plate was to be used to cover the back box and provide additional mechanical protection. The box would then be plastered over.


The questions are:-

1. How many would consider the steel plate back box cover a desirable feature or would a simple plastic cover suffice?

2. Should the original back box be left  unearthed?


Thanks in advance.
  • Become it will be blanked off and concealed with plaster leaving absolutely no indication of where the CABLE DROP to it comes down the wall to it.


    Therefore the cable drop is not in a permitted zone and it does not comply with the regulations.


    Andy Betteridge
  • I am not quite clear why the old socket has to be removed. If it is not a spur itself, a further socket may be spurred off it, or the ring may be extended.


    But perhaps the intention is to place a cupboard over the location.


    Here is one that I found earlier. This badgery was revealed when a cooker hood was removed. The photo doesn't show it, but there was a socket about 8" below.

    7b5b310896cb1a1a96104d419fc42f55-huge-img_04671.jpg
  • true - and originally the box would have been earthed, even if not by wire, when the socket was attached to it.

    The better option would be something like a plastic wago box, or heat shrink over the whole lot.

    I'd wholeheartedly agree, plaster and tile adhesive are not exactly good conductors, and if dry may be considered to be insulating but like cement are quite capable of passing a few milliamps in to a hand sized contact area when steamed up a bit.  A good few years  ago, before RCDs were so common, I have seen an emulsion painted wall that when leant on gave a mild tingle sort of shock, but it was only noticed at certain times - when humidity was high as it turned out - the cause was eventually traced to a damaged cable in the room on the other side.

  • 2. Should the original back box be left  unearthed?



    The basics of shock protection will still apply - which in effect means you need to provide either earthing or double/reinforced insulation. Unless you're going to make a claim on the (possibly damp) plaster to provide a reliable second layer of insulation (I wouldn't be comfortable doing so) then shock protection needs to be provided at the box. So either double insulate all live conductors within the box (and to my mind a couple of wraps of tape isn't anything like sufficient for that - we should be thinking of something more akin to a cable sheath as a minimum - let alone the problem of the inevitable gaps where the cores emerge from the cable sheath), subsitute both box and lid for insulating versions, or solidly earth both the box and lid (if metallic).


    +1 for the earlier comments about the origianl cable drop being outside of zones if the original socket is removed and/or made invisible.


      - Andy.
  • The socket that is going  to be removed - is it currently fed from a vertical cable, or a horizontal one ?   If horizontal, extend horizontally, if vertical extend vertically.

    Anything with a change of direction however needs to be arranged so that both the new and the original cables follow a line of least surprise for anyone drilling for a knife rack or whatever at a later date. A hidden turn is a drilled cable waiting to happen.

  • PG:




    Sparkingchip:

    What’s wrong with lifting the floor up in the room above the kitchen and moving the cables so they drop straight into the new socket?


     Andy Betteridge 




    Nothing wrong with your alternative. The horizontal link is easier, I can do it before the kitchen fitter removes all the existing units on the wall.

    Do you think that there is something incorrect with the proposed method Andy?


     




    Yes, it it a  bodge job that won’t comply with the regulations.


    The cable runs will not be in the permitted zones and anyone fixing anything to the wall will not have any idea where the original vertical drop.


    The comments about not earthing back boxes to avoid introducing an earth potential are bizarre.


    I would not use crimps on solid conductors such as those in twin and earth cable.


    If you can lift the floor and move the cable above the kitchen then bring a new drop straight down into the new socket and remove the old redundant cable.


     Andy Betteridge 


  • PG:

    Thanks - I think that I may switch to the silicon seal of a blank plate proposal.



    Consider also new tiles at blank plate. Silicon seal is usually a bodge by a tiling amateur, and a pita when fault finding or at an inspection. I was in house the other day.(sockets tripping), where the customer didn't want sockets removed for fault finding, because of sealant and a gap around tiles. A sharp knife solved the problem, to his satisfaction!


    Also same house - 2 twin 13A spurs above the kitchen top sealed in, and a metal single gang box mounted on top of another twin metal box, for a flexible cable to the microwave in front - no plug! Customer seemed pleased with the new kitchen .......... I made an excuse and ............. ran away..  


    Jaymack


    Jaymack.
  • Make all hidden cable runs blinkin OBVIOUS so that nobody drills through hidden cables in the future. Look at this please...

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1473919/MPs-daughter-electrocuted-in-botched-fitted-kitchen.html


    Z.
  • Blank plate at old socket position and earth the existing metal box, why not? The blanking plate will indicate the vertical and horizontal hidden cable runs in the wall  plaster. 


    Z.
  • We have a mentioned maintaining the zones.

    Some of us might have assumed that another point also indicates the existing vertical zone prior to ammendment by this addition.

    Some of us might have assumed it was the only point therefore that zone will be lost.

    Clearly keeping a redundant socket or changing to blanking plate indidcates existing vertical (and horizontal) zones therefore has its merits.

    Ideally of course reroute the cables from above is what most of us would do, zone maintained.


    Plus, as does happen, a blanking plate runs a real risk that years later A.N. Other removes that plate and plasters in therefore removing the zone.


    Another one to watch for in kitchens is that whilst zones should be obvious above worktops but often are not below - if there is a point under the worktop fed vertically to ceiling and there is no point corresponding above worktop in that zone then the setup rather depends on whether the one below is hidden from normal view (washer/dryer etc) or is easily seen because there is only a veg rack there or it`s an open space say.

    Not all DIYers would pop the washer out to take a glance. Fitting a steel cutlery rack could invite disater