Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 43 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 4001 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ring Main Joint Box

PG
A kitchen worktop twin S,O, is to be relocated horizontally by about 60cm. 

The ring final cct (RFC) is cabled in buried T&E and the galv' steel back-box is flushed into the plaster/brick wall.

The RFC T&E extension cabling will be buried under plaster, covered in plastic capping along the horizontal  prescribed zone. Visually, it would be reasonable for an electrician to be aware that the route may contain cable(s).

The circuit is RCD protected.

The intent is touse insulated crimp and double insulating tape the jointed cables within the existing box to achieve a maintenance free connection, A 2mm thick (fabricated) plate was to be used to cover the back box and provide additional mechanical protection. The box would then be plastered over.


The questions are:-

1. How many would consider the steel plate back box cover a desirable feature or would a simple plastic cover suffice?

2. Should the original back box be left  unearthed?


Thanks in advance.
  • 0
    I have a strong dislike for any inaccessible hidden joints. They may fail with time and be a real pain to locate. Is it not possible to leave the existing socket where it is and just run a cable to the additional new socket? That way you know where the joints and cables are located. Or leave a visible plastic blank plate to indicate where the old socket used to be.


    I like the fist sentence of 526.3 regarding joint accessibility for inspection, testing and maintenance. I know that there are exceptions, but they don't count in my book.


    Z.
  • 0
    Bad cable or bad crimp job?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChScAtiTCGs


    Z.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Could you not convince the customer to leave a surface cover plate exposed and accessible ? There are exceptions for crimp joints in BS7671 if you include the phrase 'or appropriate compression tool' but you are still left with the uncomfortable feeling of inaccessibility. If you must do it then I would go for a steel cover plate as it is not easily combustible and gives additional impact resistance. I would earth the back box as if it were plastered steel capping.
  • 0
    A 2mm thick steel plate hidfden below plaster gives not much mechanical protection.

    Socket or blank plate left in old position is my favourite . If however the old box still complies with zoning requirements in the new situation then you need not bother and your 2mm steel cover is ok. Joints must be permanent ie crimped (not my pref) or soldered etc i.e. permanent.
  • 0
    if you are moving the socket horizontally from its original position what is there to signify the original drop to the original socket?
  • 0

    Zoomup:

    I have a strong dislike for any inaccessible hidden joints. They may fail with time and be a real pain to locate. Is it not possible to leave the existing socket where it is and just run a cable to the additional new socket? That way you know where the joints and cables are located. Or leave a visible plastic blank plate to indicate where the old socket used to be.


    I like the fist sentence of 526.3 regarding joint accessibility for inspection, testing and maintenance. I know that there are exceptions, but they don't count in my book.


    Z.




     

  • 0
    Zoomup - I'm struggling with the site.

    Thanks for your answer.

    The existing socket will be positioned between the new sink and drainer so should move. I could put a blank on and seal with silicon sealant but it will not look great on the new tiled surface.

    Regards
  • 0

    Pat Eardley:

    Could you not convince the customer to leave a surface cover plate exposed and accessible ? There are exceptions for crimp joints in BS7671 if you include the phrase 'or appropriate compression tool' but you are still left with the uncomfortable feeling of inaccessibility. If you must do it then I would go for a steel cover plate as it is not easily combustible and gives additional impact resistance. I would earth the back box as if it were plastered steel capping.




     

  • 0
    Thanks - I have never earthed steel capping and was thinking that it may be as well not to introduce earth potential in the box.
  • 0

    Typiod:

    if you are moving the socket horizontally from its original position what is there to signify the original drop to the original socket?




    You are correct, all the existing sockets are actually dropping from the ceiling (all concealed by plaster). The circuit extension under discussion would be horizontal - but still within the prescribed zones depicted in the OSG. My point was that it shouldn't be a surprise for someone who was aware of prescribed zones.

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines