The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
alanblaby:
Yes, I'd like to know the theory too.
We installed a large DB in a hospital suite to supply a single scanner, and its associated auxilaries.
The DB/Panel was custom made by T. Clarke. It was fed direct from the substation by a 5 core SWA cable, iirc, 185mm, though it may have been 95mm, its 2 years ago now.
Inside the panel was the usual earth bar and outgoing circuit connections on it, then a separate 'Clean Earth Bar' which had a number of 10mm cables going to almost all machines in the room.
Being as the earth was supplied direct from the substation to the DB, then how can that 'clean earth' be any different to the normal earth bar?
The scanner suite is most likely a group 2 medical location, so that clean earth bar may actually have been part of a safety earthing system aimed at limiting microshocks to patients in conjunction with a medical isolation system. In that environment you are really trying to control touch potentials. A bit of ohms law tells us that V = I x R, from which we could say that Vtouch = Ifault x R, where R is the resistance (impedance) between an item and the earth reference bar (ie the point of common coupling akin to a room MET). For a given fault current, keeping R low (ie big fat copper cables) reduces touch voltages.
Regards
OMS
Inside the panel was the usual earth bar and outgoing circuit connections on it, then a separate 'Clean Earth Bar' which had a number of 10mm cables going to almost all machines in the room.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site