This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Need for Additional protection for circuits serving zones 1 and 2 in a bathroom

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am looking at a like for like replacement of a shower and trying to avoid the cost of replacing the CU if possible as the property is likely to be completely gutted in the next 12 months and fitting a new CU before this is difficult to justify.

I am confused because the regs seem to contradict themselves.


701.411.3.3 states Additional protection shall be provided for all low voltage circuits of the locations including circuits that pass through zones 1 and or 2.... by the use of one or more RCD's.


Then 701.415.2 States that supplementary bonding is required unless main bonding is in place and all circuits are protected by a 30mA RCD.


To me 701.411.3.3 seems to state an RCD is always required but 701.415.2 implies that if supplementary bonding is in place then an RCD is not essential.


I would be interested in your views.


Thanks


Alan
  • Alan, I think that you are being very sensible. Even if you do it for "mate's rates" (a couple of beers or whatever) you probably should be insured. However meticulous you may be, if anything went wrong and the wiring was blamed (rightly or wrongly) you could be in the poo.


    Good luck with the rest of your training and stick around in here - it is a great place to learn.