The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

2 plate lighting question

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hi all,


New to the forum so please be kind! I'm starting a rewire of my home and have decided for a multitude of reasons to go with wiring the lighting using the 2 plate method(smart light switches and the like mostly requiring neutral). I was intending and can't see any negatives to doing it slightly differently in that I wasn't going to take the feed for following on differently switched lights from the switch, instead I plan to supply one junction box from the consumer unit and then spur off for each room's lighting (may install a second jb depending on how congested the first is looking). 


In doing this I would avoid there ever being a need for more than 3 cables in a single light switch, i.e. worst case scenario i'd have permanent supply (from jb), switched supply to light fitting and lastly in some cases a 3C & CPC for 2 Way switching. Plus in my mind make future installs easier, i.e. any additional feed coming from one central point.


Can anyone think of any good reason not to do the above? Can't see anything in the regs to suggest this would be a problem? 


Cheers all!
  • AJJewsbury:
    Why not just use the traditional three plate system with permanent L, N, and switched L at the ceiling light positions, then just run a three core and earth down to the switches for the N?

    'cos you'll have no chance at stuffing that lot into the back one of the fancy decorative light fittings, which seem to think that providing for 1off each L, N and PE is sufficient (some don't even provide a PE terminal, let alone space to add any)?

       - Andy.


    But that is what the  void above is for Andy.


    Z.


  • gbruell:

    Hi all,


    New to the forum so please be kind! I'm starting a rewire of my home and have decided for a multitude of reasons to go with wiring the lighting using the 2 plate method(smart light switches and the like mostly requiring neutral). I was intending and can't see any negatives to doing it slightly differently in that I wasn't going to take the feed for following on differently switched lights from the switch, instead I plan to supply one junction box from the consumer unit and then spur off for each room's lighting (may install a second jb depending on how congested the first is looking). 


     


    Is the re-wire really necessary? What are the reasons please? Do we really need to rewire our homes because we can't get a few wires into a modern decorative light fitting connector? Or is it to use the totally unnecessary toy of modern complicated "smart" control switches.


    Oh ek!

     



    Samsung Smart Switch Not Working - Common Problems & Solutions



    • 1. Compatibility. Firstly, you need to know that the Samsung Smart Switch cannot work smoothly on all Android phones...

    • 2. Stability. Many users find that it is usually crashed when transferring data. When the data you transfer is too...

    • 3. Connection. If you fail to connect the target phone or computer, you need to check your network or USB cable. Please...

    • 4. Can Not Find Backed Up Data. It is also a common problem that you can not find your backed up...



    Z.


  • that way if one circuit fails you should still have some light in every room,


       - 


    There is always the tried and trusted method of using a table lamp or similar, plugged into a 13 Amp socket in case of a lighting circuit problem.


    Z.


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    If you are going for a central joint box approach, it is more conventional to take everything back there - switch cables and light cables - often with cables with an extra core or two to each position - which then gives you a lot more freedom to adjust layouts at a later date or even make temporary changes (e.g. arrange for a room being redecorated to have its lights switched from another room). Think big adaptable box with loads of wago terminals rather than a traditional round JB with 4 or 6 fixed terminals.


    Thanks Andy, could you elaborate on the advantage of a few extra cores? not quite sure how it would help me, maybe I'm being thick? 


    My plan would be to take the switch cables as they get their permanent live from the JB but then the lighting cables off the switch to their respective light point


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    wallywombat:

    But make sure such a central junction box is easily accessible, otherwise you end up with the worst of all worlds.


    Whys that? I would surely at a later date be able to take power for future lighting from a either the JB or from any of the switches as they all contain permanent L, N & CPC


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Zoomup:
    gbruell:

    Hi all,


    New to the forum so please be kind! I'm starting a rewire of my home and have decided for a multitude of reasons to go with wiring the lighting using the 2 plate method(smart light switches and the like mostly requiring neutral). I was intending and can't see any negatives to doing it slightly differently in that I wasn't going to take the feed for following on differently switched lights from the switch, instead I plan to supply one junction box from the consumer unit and then spur off for each room's lighting (may install a second jb depending on how congested the first is looking). 


     


    Is the re-wire really necessary? What are the reasons please? Do we really need to rewire our homes because we can't get a few wires into a modern decorative light fitting connector? Or is it to use the totally unnecessary toy of modern complicated "smart" control switches.




    The whole house is a rats nest of various historic cable types mixed in with some newer stuff, lots of new sockets being fed from flex wired into the rear of existing sockets, cables supplying outside lighting running through an extractor fan, tonnes of twin and earth outside &  the consumer unit is a modified Bakelite rewireable fuse box with some circuits fed via MCBs retrofitted at some point. The house is a complete renovation job, will be tearing up every floor and taking all the ceilings down so in my opinion a lot of reasons to just start from scratch electrically. 


  • Thanks Andy, could you elaborate on the advantage of a few extra cores?

    Often light fittings get replaced or extra lights wanted - if you have an spare core or two it's then easy to replace a 1G switch with a 2G one, a single lamp fitting replaced by a multi-lamp one can have the option of switching combinations of lamps separately, or an extra separately switched light can be taken from an existing lighting point - all without having to re-cut chases down to switches or pull cables long distances under inaccessible floors or ceilings.


       - Andy.
  • I have sometimes used those 20A plug in connectors by Click Scolomore (Greenbrook do a similar thing) particularly for downlighters, makes testing easier and fault finding too. Simply plug in the light when finished by one 3 core flex too (Click ones have a 4 pin plug in version too which you might need for emergency lighting but are a bit bigger so hole size might be an issue . 


    There is also a "plug & play" type thingy that can give you the master box spidery approach too but I`ve never tried that one
  • gbruell:
    wallywombat:

    But make sure such a central junction box is easily accessible, otherwise you end up with the worst of all worlds.


    Whys that? I would surely at a later date be able to take power for future lighting from a either the JB or from any of the switches as they all contain permanent L, N & CPC




    Because there's lots of reasons why you might want access to it at a future date. Even for just adding a new light and switch, the JB might be the logically easiest/best place to take a new feed, but now you can't because of access.  But its a lot more than that; you'll want to be able to test and inspect, fault-find and maybe move/remove an existing light or fitting. All of which becomes a pain if the JB is under floorboards subsequently covered by tiles or laminate or something else not easy to uncover.


    Also if the JB isn't accessible, it has to be a Maintenance Free type to BS 5733.


  • Of course it does not need to be accessible from above, I have in tricky cases in the past used a plasterboard mounting box in the ceiling with a blanking plate to act as an accessible junction box from below, both the socket sized ones and the round conduit box sized ones where the lids are flatter. It does not look quite as odd as an orphaned ceiling rose, which is another approach. (I have also seen an installation where they clearly had been sent a job lot of ceiling roses and no junction boxes, as they were used for every junction, some hidden in voids some visible...)

    All these approaches work, but they do need to be maintainable, and while in a perfect world you'd find drawings and photos in an envelope by the consumer unit to aid that, if that is not the case, at least give the next man in a good chance, and make it fairly obvious how it has been done.

    Mind you if you ant a smile, take a look at the pictures in the first post of this thread to see that 'access with tools' can mean rather different things to different installers.

    Mike.