perspicacious:
holiday chalets today on a chalet park by the sea.
I would say that the chalets are NOT to be bound by section 708 as they are permanent buildings with no wheels and are NOT a "factory produced relocatable dwelling." They are more like small permanent bungalows.
What does their planning consent allow? If only say 10 months of the year, to me they are not permanent.
Regards
BOD
Some have been there unmoved since the late 50s. They are permanent. Their occupation does not enter into the definition. They were built on site and not transported in as a manufactured unit.
EDIT. Add. Two reasons why they can not be defined as relocatable units.
1. Many are old and would fall to pieces.
2. They can not be moved as the road is too small to remove them by lorry. It is just too narrow. They are there for good.
Z.
davezawadi (David Stone):
BOD, I think you are being BAD again. Planning consent has no part in BS7671. What is the regulation reference? You are making a rather tenuous legal comment, as used by losing sides all the time!
Legislation trumps BS 7671 every time. Legislative provisions trump BS 7671 every time.
Legal definitions are very important ... it's just a pity that the ESQCR doesn't define "caravan" at all, for example.
gkenyon:
Legal definitions are very important ... it's just a pity that the ESQCR doesn't define "caravan" at all, for example.
Yes, but "caravan" is defined elsewhere in legislation.
I mentioned it in this thread.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site