This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

RCD Testing Frequency

Hi All,

Where an RCD is contained within a piece of electrical equipment such as an EV charger, is it still a requirement to test the RCD every 6 months in line with BS 7671 or are the intervals now the decision of the manufacturer of the piece of equipment containing the device?

Regards

Mark

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to gkenyon

    Can you send a link on the updated info please. I have not looked at the issue since.

  • Can you send a link on the updated info please.

    https://easee.com/2023/07/04/this-is-how-we-will-rectify-the-chargers-in-sweden/

    https://easee.com/uk/articles/easee-appeals-elsakerhetsverkets-decision/

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to gkenyon

    Cheers

  • The best resource is the IET Guidance Note Three Table 2.17 page 96, ultimately though for verification we only do a X1 Type AC test at 0 and 180 degrees then record the highest test result, utter regardless of what type of RCD it is.

  • Now, the original question was about the frequency of EV charger RCD testing, not actually about how to do it!

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Sparkingchip

    Modular 61008/009 I personally would perform six monthly as a function. Some are self testing now with the RCD function built into the CB’s and are technically a departure. I don’t know what you could enforce. 

  • Give an example 

    Sorry, of what?

       - Andy.

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to AJJewsbury

    The multiple circuit  fault issue. My experience using design software was that it calculated this. You may know something I dont

  • Say a couple of T&E cables go though a common hole in a stud in a partition wall - plasterboard screw or picture nail or DIY's drill bit then hits them - clipping say L on a 50A/10mm² shower circuit and N on a 6A/1mm² lighting circuit. The only thing "protecting" the 1.0mm² lighting N conductor is the shower circuit's 50A OPD and also the fault loop impedance is increased as half of the circuit is now in 1.0mm² rather than 10mm² so disconnection times may well be extended.

    In commercial and industrial environments it's common to have outgoing circuits from DBs wired in singles in common trunking - so any damage to insulation there is just as likely to result in a short between two different circuits as two wires of the same circuit.

    Such faults are thankfully pretty rare, but not impossible.

    AFAIK BS 7671 doesn't ask for such situations to be considered at all (e.g. see note below reg 434) - and I'm not aware of any software that does (but I have very limited experience of modern circuit design software, so willing to be presently surprised if it does).

       - Andy.

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to AJJewsbury

    Fault current rating and disconnection time,  time tripping curve required of the protective device prevents this.