Protection & wiring for 110V site transformer

Is RCBO required as a protection device for 110V 3.3kVA site transformer with 2x16A sockets or MCB would be fine?

I am also questioning the wiring from that snapshot. As far as I am aware there is 1.5mm2 (max 2.5mm2) wires used inside the device.

Also, why 4mm2 chosen for the wiring between the fuse and the isolator?

Is 16A would be definitely enough in this scenario?

  • should I treat this circuit same as regular 230V socket circuit and fit RCBO for this purpose?

    RLV sockets don't need 30mA RCD protection in the same way that 230V ones do (the RLV system with only 55V to earth makes it comparatively safe even without RCDs - see the last bit of NOTE 1 to 411.3.3) - but depending on the situation an RCD still might be needed for the primary circuit for other reasons - it depends on the circumstances.

    An RCBO on the primary wouldn't provide additional protection to the sockets on the secondary side anyway (since L-PE faults on the secondary would be seen as L-N fault current on the primary). Depending on Zs etc (on which the transformer will have an influence) you might want and RCD on the secondary to achieve 5s disconnection time for ADS on the sockets. But again it's all mights and maybes.

       - Andy.

    (edited to add 2nd bit)

  • I don't bother the output of the TX. I struggle what to use for the primary site of it. The max output current is pretty much 2x16A (2 sockets) so 32A total. This unit is 3.3kVA so we can calculate as 3300kVA / 230V = 14A so 16A MCB type D should be fine to protect this device then. Am I right?

  • Yes, though of course the D type (needed for inrush) will need a lower loop impedance, so it may be that your Zs does not permit, and you need RCD or RCBO primary to get prompt disconnection from earth faults. That will depend on the earthing arrangements and length of circuit it is supplied by.

    And you should consider the secondary earthing arrangements, as if you intend to plug in things like 110V power tools, it is, as others have noted, not the standard arrangement.

    And just because there are two unfused 16A sockets on a supply capable of delivering 32A or so does not make it sensible, unless  you have good control of what is being plugged in. If by dint of trailing leads and in-line splitters 25A of load ended up on one side only, and the other side was unloaded,  one socket would be overloaded and nothing would trip off..

    Mike.

    PS Mind you I suppose its no worse than using an unfused 32A to 16A splitter cable -  So perhaps I'm too old and fuddy-duddy about this sort of thing. The folk selling these marvels give no warning about fusing down or load management after all...
       
    All 32A in and twice 16A out for 110/230 and 400V as seen for sale by outfits that seem to be proper shops.

  • It looks like the wrong wiring diagram for several reasons.


    My 110 volt portable tool transformers are centre tapped to earth, the outputs are internally fused and they have thermal safety devices as well.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1778992-20a-circuit-breaker-110v-230v

    I would have thought the fixed transformers would be a similar specification.

  • I thought exactly the same. If there is no MCB provided for each outlet it needs to be something else internally added to make this device safe to use.

    My installation is quiet small so I am not considering voltage drop or having problems with damp so Type D 16A MCB should do the job.