The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

AI's role in digital futures and Sustainability question

Watching a youtube video today (Monday third March 2025) it stated that Chinese AI experts are being prevented from leaving the country to attend international sponsored AI meetings because the Chinese government fears that they will give away trade secrets.

I expect that the US will also follow a similar path as the trade war between the two countries heats up.

How will this impact the development of AI, in the immediate future?

Parents
  • Restrictions on the movement of AI experts, whether in China or the US, will not significantly hamper AI development in the immediate future. Historically, technology races—such as those in nuclear energy, semiconductors, and space exploration—have accelerated advancements rather than hindered them. AI, in particular, is characterised by collaboration, with open research, shared datasets, and cross-border knowledge transfer driving rapid progress.

    A compelling example of cross-border leverage is distillation, where large AI models trained in one environment are optimised for deployment in another. This technique allows innovations developed in one country to be efficiently adapted elsewhere, reducing the impact of geographic restrictions on expertise. Similarly, in the past, global talent mobility restrictions have led to the rise of distributed research hubs, ensuring that breakthroughs continue.

    In the immediate term, limitations on AI expert travel may affect conference interactions and direct knowledge exchange, but they are unlikely to halt AI progress. Instead, AI collaboration will find new modes of engagement—whether through virtual platforms, international partnerships, or decentralised research teams.

Reply
  • Restrictions on the movement of AI experts, whether in China or the US, will not significantly hamper AI development in the immediate future. Historically, technology races—such as those in nuclear energy, semiconductors, and space exploration—have accelerated advancements rather than hindered them. AI, in particular, is characterised by collaboration, with open research, shared datasets, and cross-border knowledge transfer driving rapid progress.

    A compelling example of cross-border leverage is distillation, where large AI models trained in one environment are optimised for deployment in another. This technique allows innovations developed in one country to be efficiently adapted elsewhere, reducing the impact of geographic restrictions on expertise. Similarly, in the past, global talent mobility restrictions have led to the rise of distributed research hubs, ensuring that breakthroughs continue.

    In the immediate term, limitations on AI expert travel may affect conference interactions and direct knowledge exchange, but they are unlikely to halt AI progress. Instead, AI collaboration will find new modes of engagement—whether through virtual platforms, international partnerships, or decentralised research teams.

Children
  • The limitation on the movement of Chinese AI experts going to international meetings may be only the first step.

    I watched another youtube program the other day which used AI to calculate the current Chinese population, based on "actual/real"  Chinese data - example rate of coffin manufacture or crematory usage over time.

    The formal Chinese population of 1.4 billion was found to be a gross overestimate. The best AI answer was about 700 -800 million.

    India now has the biggest population! 

    Thus China will have to limit access on these "open" Chinese databases in the near future.

    Peter Brooks

    Palm Bay FL