This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Value in IEng Registration

Afternoon all, just sitting behind a laptop screen pondering and found myself plotting course for my career progression and seemingly unlikely professional registration for CEng.


My current employer has encouraged that I achieve CEng registration (easier said than done) and any promotion to the next grade would be subject to attaining CEng. I'm wary of submitting my application for CEng due to not having an adequate level of education (I have a Bachelors degree only)  and at my age there's little chance of me returning to university for further study. I'm employed as a senior engineer and acting principal engineer within a project I'm currently commissioned. I appreciate that working at a principal engineer level does not necessarily provide the evidence required to prove that my understanding and knowledge is at a MEng level.


Rewind a few years, I was reasonably proud of successful registration and to achieve IEng, however, to date I'm of the opinion that it has done little else other than measurement / benchmark of my competence and identify area's in which I need to strengthen. My employer (at the time of registration) did not professionally recognise IEng registration and from my own observations nor do other employers (that I've noticed). A cursory glance of job listings on LinkedIn, shall normally state a requirement for applicants to hold CEng registration or working towards CEng with no mention of IEng. There's an immense pressure to achieve Chartership and with failure to do so could be possibly observed as I'm either inadequate or not quite cutting the grade by a prospective or current employer.


Is there any value to the IEng registration other than a personal achievement and worth maintaining? I imagine the nervousness and apprehension about navigating the CEng route and the fear of failure that I'm not unique in this respect and other's may have a similar story? Not sure what I would wish to hear, but knowing of others that succeeded with a similar background and level of education would provide some encouragement.


Regards,

Allan. 

Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Hi Guys


    Once again Roy has nailed it quite well. In answer to Colin's question I would suggest that IEng could remain in place for the reason he suggests - my argument has always been there are a lot of long serving IEngs who if they were to apply today for CEng a lot would just walk it - to them, me included, IEng is not a stepping stone to CEng - there was not a hope in hell's chance of getting CEng when we wanted or even, in some cases, needed it. I would like to see a process where those who wish to could "transfer" their registration on the submission of a simplified application form - Interviews could be optional at the discretion of a panel of Assessors etc. in the same way that Fellow applications are dealt with now.


    A silly but funny story - when attending a Company type interview by a major Government Department for a very large project to rationalize their estate holding I was presented as the Principal Building Service Engineer for the project. We also had our regional Director and senior Mechanical Engineer along for the interview - things were going quite well when the Client's Representative (Ex PSA) made the comment that he was concerned with my lack of academic qualifications for the role I was being proposed for (?) - Our Director rocked back on the hind legs of his chair and declared - "Oh! don't worry about Jim - he's got an MSc in Bull S**t and a Phd in ducking and diving". To say I was a little miffed is an understatement but we got the job which,. from a Building Services stand point, was a very successful job in refurbishing buildings that really needed knocking down.


    Regards Jim W
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Hi Guys


    Once again Roy has nailed it quite well. In answer to Colin's question I would suggest that IEng could remain in place for the reason he suggests - my argument has always been there are a lot of long serving IEngs who if they were to apply today for CEng a lot would just walk it - to them, me included, IEng is not a stepping stone to CEng - there was not a hope in hell's chance of getting CEng when we wanted or even, in some cases, needed it. I would like to see a process where those who wish to could "transfer" their registration on the submission of a simplified application form - Interviews could be optional at the discretion of a panel of Assessors etc. in the same way that Fellow applications are dealt with now.


    A silly but funny story - when attending a Company type interview by a major Government Department for a very large project to rationalize their estate holding I was presented as the Principal Building Service Engineer for the project. We also had our regional Director and senior Mechanical Engineer along for the interview - things were going quite well when the Client's Representative (Ex PSA) made the comment that he was concerned with my lack of academic qualifications for the role I was being proposed for (?) - Our Director rocked back on the hind legs of his chair and declared - "Oh! don't worry about Jim - he's got an MSc in Bull S**t and a Phd in ducking and diving". To say I was a little miffed is an understatement but we got the job which,. from a Building Services stand point, was a very successful job in refurbishing buildings that really needed knocking down.


    Regards Jim W
Children
No Data