I have received the following questions to provide the additional evidence of underpinning knowledge & understanding.
1. Describe the situation in which you were allocated responsibility for technical/ engineering decisions
2. Describe how you presented technical information e.g. plans and diagrams for review by other engineers in your field
3. Explain how you carried out a technical investigation, including the gathering of data, identification of sources; and explain the results of the investigation and how you ensured the quality of data that was used
4. Describe how you derived and presented the results of your investigations: for instance, describe how you used calculations, simulations, prototypes and/or engineering software to guide your technical/ engineering decisions. Explain the limitations of the techniques you used
5. Give a brief reasoned justification for your technical/ engineering decisions
6. Summarise the outcome of the project(s) and indicate how technological changes would affect your methods and/or decisions
Now my confusion is...
a. I am working as Central Workshop Manager in a construction company, I'm in a dilemma to prepare the evidence as it is not clear to me whether asking about a particular incident related to a equipment in a construction project or the engineering involved during planning, execution, estimation, installation, maintenance and management of total equipment in a construction project.
b. Question number 3 to 6 is very close to a incident/accident investigation for a particular equipment
If I provide the evidence in (b) way, it will be very specific but a very little scope of engineering. Whether in (a) way I can provide an comprehensive engineering evidence since equipment planning, selection, installation, maintenance and management in a construction project.
Please advise.
