This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

CEng Application Length

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

In the context of a CEng application, from the guidance notes on page 2, it states "The requirement is not to exceed a total of 12 pages for the whole application when printed."


When I went to the review section, the accountability diagram, copies of my certificates and other 'supporting document' evidence such as 'Assessment Summary' were not present in the application pdf when I clicked 'Download Application'. Are these items considered separate? I would have thought 'full application' included those documents too. I see a total of 5 pages in the downloaded document that seems to cover everything else (employment history etc).


Is the 12 page figure the number of pages that should be present when I click the 'Download Application' in the review section, or does it also include certificates, accountability diagram etc? Are the supporting documents sent separately?


Sorry if it's been asked before, but it also says "You should aim to provide roughly 3000 characters as it is unlikely that less will adequately demonstrate your relevant experience."


For most past employment entries I have 3000 or thereabouts. However for my current and primary role which demonstrates the most, I have currently 7000 which is over double the amount requested. Is this excessive to the extent that it would be marked down?

Parents
  • Hi Jim,  That is a good point about non-technical voluntary work satisfying D3.  I, for one, usually think of things like STEM activities, STEM Ambassador and so on under this heading, but you are right - D competencies can be evidenced in many different ways.  I certainly agree with you that the PRI should provide plenty of D evidence, but I like to ensure that my candidates demonstrate enough competence in all of the categories to earn their right to an interview and not get mired down with full evidence statements, etc., which in my experience, cause some individuals difficulties.  No need to devote paragraphs and take up valuable space as you say, but at least demonstrate some knowledge and practice!
Reply
  • Hi Jim,  That is a good point about non-technical voluntary work satisfying D3.  I, for one, usually think of things like STEM activities, STEM Ambassador and so on under this heading, but you are right - D competencies can be evidenced in many different ways.  I certainly agree with you that the PRI should provide plenty of D evidence, but I like to ensure that my candidates demonstrate enough competence in all of the categories to earn their right to an interview and not get mired down with full evidence statements, etc., which in my experience, cause some individuals difficulties.  No need to devote paragraphs and take up valuable space as you say, but at least demonstrate some knowledge and practice!
Children
No Data