Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Suggested Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Replies 15 replies
  • Answers 2 answers
  • Subscribers 19 subscribers
  • Views 7655 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in

CEng Additional Evidence Required

Ahmed Taha

Hi everyone, 

I wanted to have your with the ongoing review process of my application with the IET.

I submitted my application in May 2023, verified by three supporters. In August, I received a request for Further Evidence, specifically related to competencies A and B in the self-assessment section. In response, I submitted five new case studies, each tailored to address competencies A1, A2, B1, B2, and B3.

Recently, I received another communication from the IET, which posed several detailed questions seeking additional insights into my skills and knowledge. I have prepared my responses, but I find these queries somewhat repetitive, considering the comprehensive details about my professional roles are outlined in my CV, which has been shared with them.

The questions are as follows:

  1. Have you cited as a principal contractor role, and if so, can you explain about this specific role and who signed off your work?  
  2. As you have acted as a main contractor, have you done any detailed design for a contractor to the build against it, or is the design work you do conceptual? (i.e. the contractor works up the detailed design, and if so who signs off your work?)  
  3. Have you done conceptual design on behalf of a client, and if so, who signed off your work?  
  4. Can you provide a detailed short circuit and load flow analysis and generator sizing calculations? Did you do any protection settings as well as an earthing study?

Note: I have not worked as a principal contractor. However, I functioned as the main designer representing the principal contractor. And this was clearly indicated in my CV and my originally submitted application.

I have prepared a detailed response that I can share with anyone willing to review to ensure it adequately addresses the IET's queries.

Moreover, if you have any general recommendations that could be beneficial at this stage, I would appreciate to discuss them further.

Regards,

Ahmed

Parents
  • 0

    Hi,

    My PRI was held two months ago.My application also accepted without any questions before PRI.However at the date of interview there was some technical issues in the data line.but it just happened for 2,3 minutes.Interview went about 1.5 hours.Everything was going pretty much good.I answered for every questions. Few days ago (1 month after PRI) , I was received a mail from IET that i have to face for 2d interview due to technical issue at the first PRI date.I accepted the date. Do you have any idea about it.because at the first date I faced for 1.5 hours. Was there any lack of competence in me and IET willing to give a second chance?

  • 0 in reply to Eng. Rajitha Ukwatta

    I cannot comment on your specifics as not privy, but do interview and assess a lot, so I can surmise what probably has happened.

    Firstly, 1.5 hrs a long time, even allowing for a few minutes of line issues, that is a long time. This usually occurs because the interviewers are trying to extract what they need from you and oft times, if that is difficult, not forthcoming or the deemed level not quite enough, then we do try and pull as much to allow an 'on balance' view ... remember... the interviewers are on your side - there are no gotcha's

    It is possible they made a recommendation and the post panel (who look independently at your submissions and the interview report) felt that they either did not agree, or felt the material circumstance (long interview, technical difficulties) may have adversely affected the outcome. (Don't read anything into this - just the process we have agreed with the Engineering Council)

    The net result is that they felt another run of the interview was the most appropriate and fair thing to do.

    The whole process is a peer review. The pre-panel review your submission and make an interview recommendation where they may have highlight areas they felt needed a bit more challenge, The interviewers went on as long as they could to get out of you what was needed, and the post panel coldly reviewed and felt that possibly the report was a bit harsh, they did not agree or felt the time taken etc could have affected the outcome..... this is as per process and is to give you the very best possible chance of success.

    I would suggest a couple of things in preparation:

    1. Reflect on why they took 1.5 hours (50 -60 mins in normal). Were you clear enough ? Did you have good examples ? Did you really know your career and personal achievements ? Was you presentation appropriate ?

    2. Get in touch with a PRA (IET staff can help sort) and ask them to run through the competence areas so you are clear what is actually being looked for and can prepare a clearer responses.

    3. Make a few notes (not too many), but a crib-sheet for the interview can be very handy to ensure you highlight what you consider your best evidence

    You have done it once and so must realise it is not an interview, but a conversation ... relax, reflect on what happened, get some advice so you are clear on the criteria and prepare a bit better

    Good luck

Reply
  • 0 in reply to Eng. Rajitha Ukwatta

    I cannot comment on your specifics as not privy, but do interview and assess a lot, so I can surmise what probably has happened.

    Firstly, 1.5 hrs a long time, even allowing for a few minutes of line issues, that is a long time. This usually occurs because the interviewers are trying to extract what they need from you and oft times, if that is difficult, not forthcoming or the deemed level not quite enough, then we do try and pull as much to allow an 'on balance' view ... remember... the interviewers are on your side - there are no gotcha's

    It is possible they made a recommendation and the post panel (who look independently at your submissions and the interview report) felt that they either did not agree, or felt the material circumstance (long interview, technical difficulties) may have adversely affected the outcome. (Don't read anything into this - just the process we have agreed with the Engineering Council)

    The net result is that they felt another run of the interview was the most appropriate and fair thing to do.

    The whole process is a peer review. The pre-panel review your submission and make an interview recommendation where they may have highlight areas they felt needed a bit more challenge, The interviewers went on as long as they could to get out of you what was needed, and the post panel coldly reviewed and felt that possibly the report was a bit harsh, they did not agree or felt the time taken etc could have affected the outcome..... this is as per process and is to give you the very best possible chance of success.

    I would suggest a couple of things in preparation:

    1. Reflect on why they took 1.5 hours (50 -60 mins in normal). Were you clear enough ? Did you have good examples ? Did you really know your career and personal achievements ? Was you presentation appropriate ?

    2. Get in touch with a PRA (IET staff can help sort) and ask them to run through the competence areas so you are clear what is actually being looked for and can prepare a clearer responses.

    3. Make a few notes (not too many), but a crib-sheet for the interview can be very handy to ensure you highlight what you consider your best evidence

    You have done it once and so must realise it is not an interview, but a conversation ... relax, reflect on what happened, get some advice so you are clear on the criteria and prepare a bit better

    Good luck

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines