How do we solve the Catch 22 of Skills?

Employers are frustrated that young people emerging from education don’t have the skills they are looking for. Young people emerging from education are keen to work but can’t get jobs because they don’t have the skills employers are looking for. A classic Catch 22 conundrum – how do we fix this?

Last month the IET published a skills survey that was launched at a joint event with Student Energy, who were presenting a report of their own on young people entering the energy transition labour market. The lively debate that took place is available to view. The organisations spoke respectively to employers and students both groups expressing a clear desire for more and better training to help bridge the gap between formal education and employment, and for career progression into new roles or to cover new responsibilities.  

Apprenticeships, graduate programmes, and internships are a great way to receive practical training, but these programmes are only available to a minority, and often those working for larger organisation.

How do we find different ways to bridge this gap? Could accessible online learning be an acceptable alternative that employers would consider? Perhaps young engineers already have the skills, but they are not presenting them in the right way because they don’t know how?

If engineers can’t find a solution to this, I don’t know who can – what are your thoughts?

Parents
  • This is such a multifaceted issue, so I'll be very interested in some of the replies here.

    Aside from Simon Baker's reply/thread, there's another argument here that young engineers in the UK are emerging from education better equipped than UK engineering firms can handle.

    I've had graduate feedback that their company has only demanded of them Excel Spreadsheet skills, & PowerPoint Presentation skills since joining. These are talented young engineers that have spent 3-4 years mastering calculus, control theory, finite element analysis, programming, and other demanding analytical skills only for their employer to critique them on not knowing how to do a VLOOKUP. Are UK companies equipped with the right opportunities for young engineering professionals? 

  • It does feel like there's a low risk appetite in recruitment generally. We often hear about how expensive the process is and as a hiring manager the pressure is often intense to try and describe in minute detail who and what the ideal candidate would be - to the extent that sometimes I read job descriptions that are pages long and would need someone with superpowers to be able to tick all the boxes.

    Maybe a new system where people who seem like a pretty decent match could be given a more significant trial period - this would give them paid on the job experience which could be logged and used to support their CV and CPD - and employers would have a chance to really see whether they are the right fit for the role. I guess it could be open to exploitation by unscrupulous employers - but then they will always find a way to be unscrupulous!

Reply
  • It does feel like there's a low risk appetite in recruitment generally. We often hear about how expensive the process is and as a hiring manager the pressure is often intense to try and describe in minute detail who and what the ideal candidate would be - to the extent that sometimes I read job descriptions that are pages long and would need someone with superpowers to be able to tick all the boxes.

    Maybe a new system where people who seem like a pretty decent match could be given a more significant trial period - this would give them paid on the job experience which could be logged and used to support their CV and CPD - and employers would have a chance to really see whether they are the right fit for the role. I guess it could be open to exploitation by unscrupulous employers - but then they will always find a way to be unscrupulous!

Children
No Data