Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 19 subscribers
  • Views 393 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in

When Competence Stops at the Clipboard: How Manufacturing Breeds Accidental Managers

David Philip Scutter

Many small and mid-sized manufacturers confuse administrative reliability with true leadership.

Over time, this breeds a culture of reactive management — where planners and coordinators evolve into “accidental managers” without ever learning to manage people, only processes.

They insert themselves as bottlenecks, acting as gatekeepers because trust is scarce. Directors often mistake this for diligence, when in truth it’s dependency — a fragile model that collapses when that single gatekeeper is unavailable.

Succession planning often reveals how few true leaders exist within such systems. As automation and AI continue to embed into manufacturing, it’s crucial these flaws aren’t reinforced by the very systems we build.

How do we prevent that — and what does effective leadership development really look like at the small-business level?

#leadership #manufacturing #management #systems #engineeringmanagement #careerdevelopment

Parents

  • I feel this isnt just an issue with small or mid sized manufacturers; it's prevalent across many industries. The core problem often lies in a culture of reactive management rather than proactive leadership. Effective leadership , in my view, is genuinely about flipping the mangement triangle the opposite way. It means leading by example and making the correct decisions, utilising the resources correctly by investing in people and building trust, rather than reinforcing fragile dependencies on a single gatekeeper. This issue is ofteen exacerbated when managers utilise their positions purely for self growth or personal direction without having the correct mindset or fondational knowledge of what true leadership entails. They often turn into little more than method actors or salespeople, performing a role insincerely rather than genuinely leading. Whats more, it often means that truly effective, good managers get overlooked becausetheir essential work of building trust and developing people is less visable and harder to quantify than the flashy, self promoting performance of o thers.

Reply

  • I feel this isnt just an issue with small or mid sized manufacturers; it's prevalent across many industries. The core problem often lies in a culture of reactive management rather than proactive leadership. Effective leadership , in my view, is genuinely about flipping the mangement triangle the opposite way. It means leading by example and making the correct decisions, utilising the resources correctly by investing in people and building trust, rather than reinforcing fragile dependencies on a single gatekeeper. This issue is ofteen exacerbated when managers utilise their positions purely for self growth or personal direction without having the correct mindset or fondational knowledge of what true leadership entails. They often turn into little more than method actors or salespeople, performing a role insincerely rather than genuinely leading. Whats more, it often means that truly effective, good managers get overlooked becausetheir essential work of building trust and developing people is less visable and harder to quantify than the flashy, self promoting performance of o thers.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines