Challenges for Academics Applying for CEng

I would like to highlight the challenges faced by applicants from academia when applying for professional registration (e.g., CEng) through the Institution of Engineering and Technology. From my experience, some common challenges include:

  • Demonstrating industry-relevant engineering practice while primarily working in teaching and research
  • Evidencing competencies related to responsibility, leadership, and decision-making in real-world engineering contexts
  • Aligning academic activities (teaching, supervision, research) with the required professional competencies
  • Providing strong evidence for design, development, and implementation in practical settings
Parents
  • It may depend on what sort of academic we're talking about here.

    I have known university lecturers with Chartered Engineer status.  They will have written up business cases for research projects, applied for funding, recuruited PhD students or postdoc researchers, and maganged the research projects.

    This is essentially the same as an R&D group leader in industry. And nobody would claim that they couldn't be chartered.

Reply
  • It may depend on what sort of academic we're talking about here.

    I have known university lecturers with Chartered Engineer status.  They will have written up business cases for research projects, applied for funding, recuruited PhD students or postdoc researchers, and maganged the research projects.

    This is essentially the same as an R&D group leader in industry. And nobody would claim that they couldn't be chartered.

Children
  • I think it very much depends. I've met many a university lecturer that, not only where developing their own courses, but were engaged in research coming up with some very good engineering ideas. Mmany of them were CEng's (or similar) and for those that were not, they absolutely could be if they desired.

    But I've also come across an academic, who wrote a book which we used as a course book for a project management course, that the content clearly indicated that they had done very little real world systems engineering. This is the pure science researcher. I would argue they lack certain engineering competencies, regardless of if they are a PhD or not. They probably would meet the requirements for Chartered status in a science domain, such as CPhys. Which I'm going to state, isn't a lower standard, but it has a different scope.

    Although, i've come across similar cases with corporate trainers giving requirements courses! They often assume a perfection of stakeholder requirements that never exists.

  • I'd absolutely agree Simon, and further I've worked with many academics who get their funding from working on industrial projects where they basically form part of the partner's (e.g our) engineering team. In my original post I nearly said that all of the engineering academics I come across are actively engaged on industrial projects so wouldn't have a problem with any of this - but then realised that was a slightly silly statement since of course it's true by it's own definition! However, university funding being what it is, I wouldn't be surprised if a large proportion are.