Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 77 replies
  • Subscribers 17 subscribers
  • Views 7268 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Time to Knock IEng on the Head

Peter Miller
IEng registration in terminal decline
Parents
  • 0

    Simon Barker:

    there seems to be a vocal minority of CEng registrants who would like to not only keep it that way, but ensure that only CEng has any value at all. 




    If so please let us know where they are so that some of us very vocal CEng registrants can vocalise against them! I have not heard any CEng registrants express this view, but that is not to say there aren't any - if so I for one would like to see them brought out of the woodwork.

    Unless what they are saying is that all professional engineers should be CEng (which would mean not that IEng has no value, but instead that it is unnecessary as it would be replaced by CEng), which is a perfectly valid proposal, although not one I would personally propose for the reasons I gave above.


    As you can imagine I totally agree with Alasdair's post...


    Cheers,


    Andy

Reply
  • 0

    Simon Barker:

    there seems to be a vocal minority of CEng registrants who would like to not only keep it that way, but ensure that only CEng has any value at all. 




    If so please let us know where they are so that some of us very vocal CEng registrants can vocalise against them! I have not heard any CEng registrants express this view, but that is not to say there aren't any - if so I for one would like to see them brought out of the woodwork.

    Unless what they are saying is that all professional engineers should be CEng (which would mean not that IEng has no value, but instead that it is unnecessary as it would be replaced by CEng), which is a perfectly valid proposal, although not one I would personally propose for the reasons I gave above.


    As you can imagine I totally agree with Alasdair's post...


    Cheers,


    Andy

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines