Time to Knock IEng on the Head

Andy Millar:

Simon Barker:

there seems to be a vocal minority of CEng registrants who would like to not only keep it that way, but ensure that only CEng has any value at all. 

If so please let us know where they are so that some of us very vocal CEng registrants can vocalise against them! I have not heard any CEng registrants express this view, but that is not to say there aren't any - if so I for one would like to see them brought out of the woodwork.

Unless what they are saying is that all professional engineers should be CEng (which would mean not that IEng has no value, but instead that it is unnecessary as it would be replaced by CEng), which is a perfectly valid proposal, although not one I would personally propose for the reasons I gave above.


As you can imagine I totally agree with Alasdair's post...


Cheers,


Andy

 

Andy Millar:

Simon Barker:

there seems to be a vocal minority of CEng registrants who would like to not only keep it that way, but ensure that only CEng has any value at all. 

If so please let us know where they are so that some of us very vocal CEng registrants can vocalise against them! I have not heard any CEng registrants express this view, but that is not to say there aren't any - if so I for one would like to see them brought out of the woodwork.

Unless what they are saying is that all professional engineers should be CEng (which would mean not that IEng has no value, but instead that it is unnecessary as it would be replaced by CEng), which is a perfectly valid proposal, although not one I would personally propose for the reasons I gave above.


As you can imagine I totally agree with Alasdair's post...


Cheers,


Andy