This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

ARE CENG AND IENG EQUAL IN STATUS

Can we say that the CEng and IEng be considered equal titles in professional status or IEng is inferior than CEng.

As the Application Form for both CEng and IEng is same.
Parents
  • Moshe


    You are reaching near to the right solution.  I am happy.  But there is a little problem.  IEng cannot be omitted because it relates to the Bachelors Degree whereas CEng relates to the Masters Degree.  Therefore, it would be much better that IEng should be continued and ITech should be introduced.  The ECUK may consider these titles:

    CEng (Chartered Engineer) - minimum 18 years of Masters of Engineering Degree - related to Washington Accord (Professional Engineer)
    CTech (Chartered Technologist) - minimum 18 years of Masters of Technology Degree - related to Sydney Accord (Engineering Technologist)
    IEng (Incorporated Engineer) - minimum 16 years of Bachelors of Engineering Degree 
    ITech (Incorporated Technologist) - minimum 16 years of Bachelors of Technology Degree
    EngTech (Engineering Technician) - minimum 12 years of Engineering or Technology Diploma.


    I reiterate that CEng and CTech, likewise IEng and ITech should be treated at par (equivalent) but in their own field.  If someone says that CEng and CTech, likewise IEng and ITech are not euivalent then i strongly disagree and i shall consider it as biasness.    


    I dont know, whether our this discussion would be endorsed or forwarded to the ECUK to consider or not, but at least i am satisfied that we are reaching on some fruitful conclusions.


    Please note that above are defined as standard route (academic route).  individual or work based route can also be discussed separately.


    Thank you.

Reply
  • Moshe


    You are reaching near to the right solution.  I am happy.  But there is a little problem.  IEng cannot be omitted because it relates to the Bachelors Degree whereas CEng relates to the Masters Degree.  Therefore, it would be much better that IEng should be continued and ITech should be introduced.  The ECUK may consider these titles:

    CEng (Chartered Engineer) - minimum 18 years of Masters of Engineering Degree - related to Washington Accord (Professional Engineer)
    CTech (Chartered Technologist) - minimum 18 years of Masters of Technology Degree - related to Sydney Accord (Engineering Technologist)
    IEng (Incorporated Engineer) - minimum 16 years of Bachelors of Engineering Degree 
    ITech (Incorporated Technologist) - minimum 16 years of Bachelors of Technology Degree
    EngTech (Engineering Technician) - minimum 12 years of Engineering or Technology Diploma.


    I reiterate that CEng and CTech, likewise IEng and ITech should be treated at par (equivalent) but in their own field.  If someone says that CEng and CTech, likewise IEng and ITech are not euivalent then i strongly disagree and i shall consider it as biasness.    


    I dont know, whether our this discussion would be endorsed or forwarded to the ECUK to consider or not, but at least i am satisfied that we are reaching on some fruitful conclusions.


    Please note that above are defined as standard route (academic route).  individual or work based route can also be discussed separately.


    Thank you.

Children
No Data