Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 15 replies
  • Subscribers 9 subscribers
  • Views 781 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

IET Safety and Security Code of Practice - Input needed

Lynsay Callaghan
Briefing Document - we want your feedback

The IET Safety TPN has been working closely with the IET Standards Team on a scope for a new Safety and Security Code of Practice.   The briefiing document is attached so have a look and let us know what you think of the idea, does it cover what you would expect, would this be useful and any other comments that we can feed back to the committee.

Next Stage

Get involved and give us your thoughts on this page.


The next stage is to hold a scoping meeting at with around 30 interested stakeholders.  If you are interested in participating in a future scoping workshop on the area, please contact Andrew Cooney (Portfolio Development Manager, IET Standards).

IET Standards

For those of you who may not know a lot about the IET Standards, IET Standards publishes authoritative standards, codes of practice and guidance materials for professional engineers and other key stakeholders, using its expertise to achieve consensus on best practice in emerging and established technology fields. Have a look to see what we already have and what is coming soon.
Parents
  • 0
    I'd be happy to support this activity, however I share the concerns about the scope.

    The title could be taken to be a CoP that addresses Safety, Securty, and their interaction.

    I believe the intended scope is CoP for securing safety related systems? ie. it is not trying to write a CoP for safety, or a CoP for Security of systems.


    It should look at the cases where safety & security are in conflict as well as when they have common interests.

    As has been identified the language of the domains should be addressed, as should the regulatory and governance similarities and differences.


    There is a potential link here with the SCSC work on assurance cases (www.scsc.org.uk/gc) where the interaction of safety and security will be discussed from an assurance perspective so I see potential for synergy between these two initiatives.


    Phil
Reply
  • 0
    I'd be happy to support this activity, however I share the concerns about the scope.

    The title could be taken to be a CoP that addresses Safety, Securty, and their interaction.

    I believe the intended scope is CoP for securing safety related systems? ie. it is not trying to write a CoP for safety, or a CoP for Security of systems.


    It should look at the cases where safety & security are in conflict as well as when they have common interests.

    As has been identified the language of the domains should be addressed, as should the regulatory and governance similarities and differences.


    There is a potential link here with the SCSC work on assurance cases (www.scsc.org.uk/gc) where the interaction of safety and security will be discussed from an assurance perspective so I see potential for synergy between these two initiatives.


    Phil
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines