Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 112 replies
  • Subscribers 15 subscribers
  • Views 6972 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

U.K. ENGINEERING 2016 REPORT

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
​I have noted in another discussion, several comments of my own, but there seems to be a lack of interest or it takes too long to read and digest the report.

​Apart from Roy's original comments and direction to be able to read the report, it would be great to find out if IMechE, ICE and the IET have had any official comments on the report and if not, when can we expect any.?


​Daniel


P.S. Just had to get away from CEng v IEng status discussion.
Parents
  • 0
    Was the author of this report paid by the page?  Even the Executive Summary runs to 4½ pages - most of it just waffle.  I have only skimmed through the rest of it.


    Having just gone through the process of applying for IEng, I am disturbed that the author thinks my new qualification should be discarded and replaced with a generic "Registered Engineer", which is indistinguishable from EngTech.  I would consider that a downgrade.
Reply
  • 0
    Was the author of this report paid by the page?  Even the Executive Summary runs to 4½ pages - most of it just waffle.  I have only skimmed through the rest of it.


    Having just gone through the process of applying for IEng, I am disturbed that the author thinks my new qualification should be discarded and replaced with a generic "Registered Engineer", which is indistinguishable from EngTech.  I would consider that a downgrade.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines