Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 112 replies
  • Subscribers 15 subscribers
  • Views 7027 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

U.K. ENGINEERING 2016 REPORT

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
​I have noted in another discussion, several comments of my own, but there seems to be a lack of interest or it takes too long to read and digest the report.

​Apart from Roy's original comments and direction to be able to read the report, it would be great to find out if IMechE, ICE and the IET have had any official comments on the report and if not, when can we expect any.?


​Daniel


P.S. Just had to get away from CEng v IEng status discussion.
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Andy, Mark,

    I think this is the right approach as long as there is a credible way to evaluate or accredit such work or apprenticeship based learning.

    I think the mature adult rout or experienced professional rout to registration as an engineer with EC UK is addressing this requirement.

    Usually a CEng or IEng or similar who is a direct line manager familiar with applicants work signs supporter forms.

    The issue is that such registration rout is discriminated against the registered engineer when it comes to international agreements and mobility of the engineers.

    Maybe an engineer achieving registration by accreditation of their prior learning should be issued a document under the royal charter of the PEI that would be recognized alternative?

    C&G used to do something in that area but no longer. It can be called Professional BEng for IEng and Professional MEng for CEng. Or to simplify the IEng or CEng certificate will also be a Professional BEng or Professional MEng.  

    Let employers decide how they want to accept it. And also develop accelerated programs with universities etc.


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Andy, Mark,

    I think this is the right approach as long as there is a credible way to evaluate or accredit such work or apprenticeship based learning.

    I think the mature adult rout or experienced professional rout to registration as an engineer with EC UK is addressing this requirement.

    Usually a CEng or IEng or similar who is a direct line manager familiar with applicants work signs supporter forms.

    The issue is that such registration rout is discriminated against the registered engineer when it comes to international agreements and mobility of the engineers.

    Maybe an engineer achieving registration by accreditation of their prior learning should be issued a document under the royal charter of the PEI that would be recognized alternative?

    C&G used to do something in that area but no longer. It can be called Professional BEng for IEng and Professional MEng for CEng. Or to simplify the IEng or CEng certificate will also be a Professional BEng or Professional MEng.  

    Let employers decide how they want to accept it. And also develop accelerated programs with universities etc.


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines