Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 112 replies
  • Subscribers 15 subscribers
  • Views 7030 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

U.K. ENGINEERING 2016 REPORT

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
​I have noted in another discussion, several comments of my own, but there seems to be a lack of interest or it takes too long to read and digest the report.

​Apart from Roy's original comments and direction to be able to read the report, it would be great to find out if IMechE, ICE and the IET have had any official comments on the report and if not, when can we expect any.?


​Daniel


P.S. Just had to get away from CEng v IEng status discussion.
Parents
  • 0
    Re Nicholai Wilson (Brian Robertson by proxy):


    I have lurked on this thread (and the preceding related threads) for a while.


    With no prejudice whatsoever this recent post is, in my opinion, the most concise and sensible post I have read across the entire discussion. As an experienced (15+ years) and degree qualified engineer who has considered IEng as a path upwards I have read the toings and froings of other contributors and see no formal benefit as yet outside of my own desire to seemingly advance. In fact, a PRA that I have informally contacted suggested that I might dive straight into CEng registration because I can and not that I am clearly an outstanding contributor to the engineering community. Once again, then, we come round to what it really means to be IEng or CEng as I am employed outside of the UK and my employer sees it only as personal advance and not necessarily direct benefit to the organisation.


    No conslusions yet, as I see but I continue to lurk with bated breath.


    Regards,


    Howard Leamon MIET
Reply
  • 0
    Re Nicholai Wilson (Brian Robertson by proxy):


    I have lurked on this thread (and the preceding related threads) for a while.


    With no prejudice whatsoever this recent post is, in my opinion, the most concise and sensible post I have read across the entire discussion. As an experienced (15+ years) and degree qualified engineer who has considered IEng as a path upwards I have read the toings and froings of other contributors and see no formal benefit as yet outside of my own desire to seemingly advance. In fact, a PRA that I have informally contacted suggested that I might dive straight into CEng registration because I can and not that I am clearly an outstanding contributor to the engineering community. Once again, then, we come round to what it really means to be IEng or CEng as I am employed outside of the UK and my employer sees it only as personal advance and not necessarily direct benefit to the organisation.


    No conslusions yet, as I see but I continue to lurk with bated breath.


    Regards,


    Howard Leamon MIET
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines