This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,

    I am retired (nearly),
    live in a country where freedom of speech is respected and is
    democratic, and everyone can vote. The UK does not allow these
    privileges.

    A PE, in the UK, would
    risk his career if he took my approach, I Know I was blacklisted by
    cowards to protect a Fake science, which IET has been corrupted to
    support.



    Saying that; I fully
    agree with what you say and do. It is on the lines we took at
    IIE.



    Restricted corporate
    discipline associations, Fake Diplomas by subjective selection are
    no longer acceptable in the Technology sector yet this is the IET
    doctrine.

    We need a pragmatic,
    fair, open system of Technology education and training – nothing
    else will be competitive with tomorrows’ technology
    world.



    Again in France (because I know the French
    system)
    nearly all MSc technology students are paid for their
    two year MSc period.

    Apprentices need to be
    paid as they will have to delocalize to train in their chosen
    sector. I left home at 15 never to return. It was not easy going,
    but our apprenticeship led most of us to leading posts in the UK
    and worldwide.

    The financing of
    apprenticeships can come from the industrial sector, a patron or
    sponsor, or the government.



    I have been trying to
    persuade IEE CEng diehards to react and reflect on the near future
    need for specialist technology “formation”. I use this word as
    training and education are one for a technologist. I refrain from
    the use of the word engineer, as we have never earned respect for
    this term. (IEng
    i
    s a denigrating English class invention).



    Now the ball is rolling,
    but I am not convinced that the IET Electrical CEng stalwarts will
    ever change or face the future. They are cosy in their bunkers;
    then like lemmings they will jump in to the sea.



    I have some of today’s
    international observations :-


    ·        
    Clinton
    (Mrs)-
     predicts that UK
    BREXIT will hit the OMC wall
    and a new engineering brain drain
    will erupt. I am old enough to know what that means. Customs and
    foreign national standards made international engineering a
    nightmare, many left for the US or ex colonies. (They took PEI CEng
    with them). – CEng
    will be no use abroad.


    ·        
    Macron
    (Pr
    Fr) – to save France they need to support small technology
    enterprises, train many more apprentices in real training schemes
    and bring grand
    ecoles
    into the university system making access, open to all,
    by merit.


    ·        
    E&T

    BREXIT was caused by jealous (lazy) working classes who will not
    move.


    ·        
    JG I see CEng IEE as
    jealous luddites who will not budge an iota.



    Technology is
    multidisciplinary even if one is a specialist. The most pragmatic
    solution to forming these technologists is the combined
    apprenticeship: practical training coupled with the appropriate
    academic instruction, the possibilities are wide open as we have no
    viable solution today. As you state, the difference today is that
    it is the financier and the college that defines the program to
    meet industry’s needs.



    Not only is technology a
    multidiscipline domain, technologist should be capable of changing
    sectors and domains from three to seven years (MoD
    requisite).



    Restrictive, UK- A levels
    and BSc with no training is not today’s solution it is not even a
    good education.



    CEng kills
    technologists.



    I have the freedom to
    speak, respecting the rules of IT chivalry; others risk having
    denigrating references if they rock the UK CEng boat.



    Andy; how many of the IET Board
    and Governors would support our claims for
    progress?

     How many of the IET Board
    and Governors would take positive action to prepare the future UK
    technologist
    for post BREXIT by a
    :

    new model of high-value
    engineering educatio
    n?




    Bon
    courage




    John Gowman, MIET -
    IEng
    Retired

    Note : all retired I Eng
    & CEng should resign from ECUK.


    MIET MSc is a good enough
    title

Children
No Data