The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,

    No one is
    interested in engineering in MIET, just look at the Future
    Engineering blogs, very few subjects very few views, no
    comments.

    Engineers
    must be able to identify ambitious projects from factual
    engineering reality.




    If they
    had a good education then they would be able to see for them
    selves.

    Why is it
    that an old (RIP) businessman and Lord of the Realm can question
    fake technology and not Engineers?




    These
    blogs are just for insisting on ones point of view and protecting a
    false status recognised nowhere outside of the UK.

    I helped
    start and run a good PEI, it is now an elitist club that is
    blocking the people of our status when we created Engineering &
    Technology.

    As a
    stake holder, I want to see the members respected, not
    denigrated.




    No point
    in wasting any more time.




    What are
    the active members doing to improve education, training for all,
    both genders from technician to PhD and long route included.




    Some good
    ideas have been mentioned, but do members really care.

    They have
    their CEng badge which opens UK doors; those that are not CEng have
    the door closed on them even if they have more experience and
    qualifications.




    I will
    never accept peer review it is biased and subjective. 

    I have
    witnessed too much Fraud and corruption in engineering which in the
    UK you would not believe, I do not want it creeping into IET.




    I have
    been coerced into situations which even V V our Rusian journalist
    would find hard to believe. 




    I want to
    see IET back on the rails with respect for all members.




    John
    Gowman



Children
No Data