This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Roy

    My opinion is that the
    practice of professional engineering will be best served by engaging of
    all
    those who have met a threshold standard of professional
    capability and commit to professional standards.

    It also seems reasonable
    that within the regulated community the term “Engineer” should be
    allocated to those at degree level, in line with other
    professions.

    The term “Technician”
    should be allocated to
    professional practice
    that is distinctively valuable by its
    more practical nature and which can be carried out successfully
    with good technical understanding, but without necessarily
    deploying graduate level knowledge attributes.


    I therefore suggest that it is time for some fresh strategic
    thinking, with the objectives of greater engagement and overall
    collective quality, not elitism and personal
    advantage
    .  

    Contributions like those
    made at this conference can only help and may stimulate progress,
    but without strategic
    momentum and in the UK voluntary context at least, real
    understanding of the market, it is only interesting talk, not
    (overdue) progress
    .   

    Engineering or modern
    Technology is a forever changing; an advancing kaleidoscope of
    disciplines and competences which are crossed linked and
    integrated.

    IET is the result of an
    attempt to unify UK PEIs, it failed for intrinsic UK class
    problems.

    IET can lead the way
    again by incorporating all its members of 5 years or more that meet
    UK Spec and have achieved 180 ECTs (University degrees) and I Eng
    registration.


    There is an umbrella
    organization of UK professional institutes that meet to promote
    their particular interests; all be it, once a month in Paris -
    Do the same at
    ECUK.





    For those incrusted in
    secure jobs not doing active engineering and at a certain age, CEng
    has become a security, a community and a religion. It has nothing
    to do with promoting technology.

    For those outside of the
    UK ,CEng is a status symbol of one-upmanship over their
    compatriots.

    The PEIs seem to be run
    by intellectuals who did not make it into mainstream R&D or
    applied technology.

    The modern engineer is a
    short term contractor
    who has to be at the
    pinnacle of his
    technology.
    He needs professional recognition for what he is
    today, not for his privileged days at university.

    The new generation of
    Engineering Technologists should stand up for themselves – they the
    majority.

    Where we are in the next
    10 years will also be the sum of our past politics.” And our past
    UK class distinctions not understood outside of the
    UK.




    Act now or forever keep
    silent.


    ·        
    Call for an ECUK umbrella
    grouping of PEIs


    ·        
    Create a PE register of
    UK nationals & residents at BSc level.


    ·        
    PEIs should recognize and
    promote technicians that take further education and training to 180
    ECTS registration


    ·        
    HNC is 120 ECTS; BSc is
    180 CTS , what is HNC + BSC = 300 ECTS ; is this not a master under
    any other term?


    ·        
    IET should today
    reclassify all its IEng that that are BSc automatically without
    Peer Reviews


    ·        
    All IEng that are BSc
    should be encouraged to  to register with FEANI, let’s face it
    , BREXIT is run like a UK PEI – They will have to work with Europe,
    CEng is of ZERO
    importance in Europe now
    and after BREXIT will be a
    joke.




    Sometimes you have to
    sit back and say OK we got it wrong, let’s analyse and do it
    correctly.

    It’s up to you, I did my
    bit getting ITEME to go to IET.

    If you want something
    you have to work for it.

    The days of going to
    “uni” and creaming the best have gone.




    I think that the ball is
    now rolling; Act now
    or forever keep silent.






    John Gowman BA
    MIET

Children
No Data