This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Alasdair,

    I appreciate your
    reply.

    I am just retired from a
    research centre in France which is leading advanced scientific and
    technological research in new domains; in brief it is part of the
    Paris Tech,  a grouping of the Ile de France region elitist,
    but open grande ecoles, the biggest Advanced Technology Teaching
    and Research campus in Europe if not worldwide.

    I was called upon to sort
    out an important project that had ground to a stop because there
    were no experienced, all round nuclear engineers available in
    France. Newly trained engineers are not trained to engineer
    anymore.

    From my experience,
    Switzerland and Germany have the best approach to Professional
    Engineer education and training.

    In the UK I have seen
    from the E&T journal that there is a new nuclear college in
    Bridgewater Summerset that has created a system to address the lack
    of nuclear skills and skilled persons from craftsman to PhD. The
    College is linked with the local university (just type Bridgewater
    Nuclear College ). It strikes me that this is the most realistic
    approach to full technology training and education that you can
    find in the UK. There are other good examples of taught
    apprenticeships in the UK, but there does not seem to be enough to
    meet tomorrow’s demands. Perhaps the real problem is there is no
    will to find a way.

    I do not think the
    selective CEng attitude of most UK PEIs is doing the country any
    good. (sorry to those MIET not UK resident, but we have a real
    internal problem and those most concerned seem to be
    retiring).

    The UK needs to have more
    apprenticeships similar to this model.

    They need to be financed
    by the end users – industry. (France is in its latest great
    revolution, last night the French President said that France’s
    future depended on good apprenticeships).

    I was an RAE apprentice,
    but I do not think any scheme could be run the way our
    apprenticeship was; we were privileged and had resources that no
    longer exist.

    No comments on UK
    politics I do not see the system lasting very long and there is no
    alternative. Our government Technology committee is run by an
    unemployed opera singer. (France’s nuclear foundries were run by a
    TV producer who killed off the industry).

    The apprenticeship
    financed by local industry and guided by local education colleges
    and universities is the ideal solution to producing competent
    technologists.

    The out of date ideas of
    mechanical, electrical restricted practice and sectarian PEIs has
    to change.

    We need advanced
    specialists, but we greatly need technologists that can understand
    other disciplines and engineer their own whilst coordinating with
    other disciplines.

    Your comment: I will be retired before the
    new engineers start to make a difference.
    Needs to be taken
    seriously by the powers to be; but I do not think the PEIs are
    really interested in a total change of attitude or by a new model of high value
    engineering education.

    They are only interested
    in selling CEng.

    There are many models
    of high value
    engineering education,
    the UK needs to find one that fits its
    specification and implement it
    ASAP.

    Regards,

     


    John Gowman, MIET (IEng
    resigned)
     





    Garanti sans virus. www.avg.com

Children
No Data