This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy Millar:




    Cheong Tsoi:

    Dear John,


    I read your posts.


    Would it be more relevant if you apply for CEng thru Nuclear Institute with your past experience in Nuclear engineering instead of IEE/IET where more suitable for traditional electrical/electronic engineers?


    Just my thought for sharing!




    Hi,


    Apologies, but I'd have to slightly disagree with this, I've found the IET CEng process to be pretty much non-discipline specific. In practice the process is looking for professionalism in engineering approach, irrespective of the specialism of the applicant. Probably a more relevant issue to consider is whether the member will find, after joining and registering, that the institution discusses issues relevant to their discipline - e.g. I have no doubt a mechanical engineer could obtain CEng through the IET but may not find it offers services as relevant as the IMechE would. (And I note your comment about "electronics and electrical engineering": when my interest was specifically electronics I, like many others, joined the IET for the CEng and the IEEE for the technical content!)


    It's actually a very difficult question. Many of us work across disciplines, and the aim when the IET was set up was that it would also work across all disciplines. Nice idea, but can one institute actually manage that without spreading itself too thinly? Whilst going in the other direction, there are those who want the chartered status to explain what they are, e.g "Chartered Electrical Engineer". Not keen on that myself, seems a very narrow and (to me) rather outdated view of engineering.


    So no easy answers, except that if a non-electrical engineer wanted to use the IET to obtain CEng I certainly wouldn't put them off by saying they wouldn't get it. Apologies for the triple negative in that sentence!


    Cheers, Andy


     




    Cheong Tsoi:
    Dear John,

    I read your posts.

    Would it be more relevant if you apply for CEng thru Nuclear Institute with your past experience in Nuclear engineering instead of IEE/IET where more suitable for traditional electrical/electronic engineers?

    Just my thought for sharing!Andy,

    I applied to the institute of nuclear engineers. I had to write a monograph on the Tritium processing Plant i engineered for JET.MY Monograph was accepted by Manchester university as MSC.

    I was refused a CEng interview my sponsor a Nuclear Eng Director wouldnot give anty references for me, It is illegal in France, he would have lost his job!.

    I checked the Nuc I they had less nuclear engineers than we had in just our one dept, not counting the few thousand around France.


    I agree I am a founder member of IET ; IET is not just electrical, it is open to all disciplines gender and grades.

    John Gowman

Children
No Data