This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy, Scott,

    You do not seem to
    understand the market.

    We have
    two major fields of employment of engineers, one is in industry
    where engineers have long standing contracts as employees.

    The other
    is in major projects which are time limited. EPR being an
    example.

    EPR is a
    power industry design & build project and a second Operate and
    Supply contract. They will not use the same engineers.

    In the
    nuclear business, there are other attached markets as well, such as
    fuel, maintenance and dismantling.



    These very
    big projects treat engineers as commodities. 

    We are
    bought and discarded at short notice. I had a 10 min interview for
    EPR, I was asked can you do the job, do you want a coffee, can you
    start at 8.30 tomorrow morning.

    Once the
    engineer has completed his task he is dismissed. That's modern
    engineering. I could give the example of industry -
    telecommunication, where I have neighbours in France that have been
    bought and sold from England and fired high and dry here in France,
    I believe they are from Andy's old employer's company. 



    The major
    project is run by stakeholders who operate an ephemere company, no
    employees. They call in technical assistance which has a skeleton
    staff of experienced engineers and a list of available contract
    engineers. Secondary technical assistance companies supply the
    major tec-ass company.



    This is
    being seen more in industry as well. As an engineering manager in a
    design office, I had a skeleton staff that was too expensive to
    change, staff on short term, project, contracts and interim staff.
    Every Friday the CEO wanted to know if we were in profit or not. If
    not, then someone had to be sacrificed. That is the market
    economy.



    The
    contract nuclear engineers were in-fact engineering specialists,
    pipe-work, structures, instrumentation etc. They drifted between
    major engineering contracts - oil, gas, deep-sea, energy,
    special-machines. A good engineer can work in many disciplines.
    Instrumentation & electrical is common to all.

    I have
    mentioned Fusion, a contract engineer would ask for 1000 to 1200 €
    a day for a short fixed term contract but  he could be between
    contracts for a very long period.



    The days
    of contract for life engineers are rare as are companies with long
    lives; every company and R&D centre I have worked for has
    closed down.

    So how do
    we get companies to train and support engineers?



    This is
    how engineering started 250 years ago, which led to unions and
    PEIs.



    The truth
    is that government has no interest, especially the UK government
    and the market sees us as commodities.

    As for
    IET, it is completely lost.



    A tip :
    the only safe employment is DAD, nuclear dismantling, the only true
    innovative engineering left; there is over 100 years work and none
    of "us" experts left, they all have to be retrained.



    A new model of high-value
    engineering education is needed
    and PEIs have to redefine their
    role in this cut throat market place.

    I did my
    bit, now it is up to the likes of Scott to at least state what they
    need and for the more experienced PEs to implement against all
    odds.

    Look at
    IET Engineering Communities, no one else does, and see what Power
    Engineering up against.



    If we do
    not make changes, the engineers  in China that I helped train
    will help you out. (They are already here). They train 50 Million
    each year.



    If the UK
    wants to stay in engineering, it will have to bring in experienced
    modern engineers now, to work and to train the UK college leavers
    at all levels; whilst it defines - A new model of high-value
    engineering education. 

    That's not
    easy with BREXIT!

    Note on
    EPR we could not use any engineers between 35 to 55. They did not
    have the experience or the competences needed nor the high-value engineering
    education
    .



    John
    Gowman 

    Ingnieur Chercheur -
    retired







    Garanti sans virus. www.avg.com

Children
No Data