This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    To Andy Moshe and
    all,



    I attach a
    private communication to ECUK

    This CEng IEng problem
    is a totally UK misaddress.

    The IET venture into neo
    liberalism is not in my favour. I do not see how our members abroad
    can be involved in this UK peculiarity.

    I consider that IET has
    lost contact with its grass roots members and its original
    principles.

    Note : I have been in
    communication with ECUK and the UK Parliament concerning plagiarism
    of my name and fraudulent use of my work on a nuclear research
    reactor in the UK, and this before the Uff
    Review.

    There are no limits to
    which people will descend to protect their prestige and image. When
    this concerns my life and reputation, I stand up
    fight.







    ECUK - CEng
    Complaint

    JG to ECUK

    Dear Sirs

    My thanks to you and your
    colleagues at UKEC for considering my request and
    complaint.



    I had a total rebuff from
    the Direction of IET.

     

    I am now bowing out from
    Professional Engineering.

    I leave the struggle for
    respect and registration of the grass roots, professional engineer
    to those same, active PEs.

    I wish to pass on my
    experience in nuclear engineering to the new incoming - nuclear
    new-build engineers; there is an important gap in experience in
    this discipline. We must not repeat the technical errors of the
    past.

     

    I have trained heads of
    Engineering disciplines in Israel and China, these countries have
    taken a new pragmatic approach to engineering; it is certain that
    soon they will be leading many domains in UK Engineering &
    Technology.



    The UK needs to face up to
    its undefined future with a new approach to professional
    engineering training, academic qualification  and PE
    registration system; I trust that the new attempts after UK 2016 will lead to a
     world respected professional system open to all grades and
    genders.



    Yours
    sincerely,

     

    John Gowman BA
    MIET.

    Xxxxxxxxxx

     

    ECUK to
    JG

    Dear Mr
    Gowman,

     

    Thank you for your
    emails of xx which I have discussed with our Operations
    Director.

     

    The Engineering Council
    is, like you, concerned about the number of engineers not
    registered and the low percentage of women in
    engineering. 


    ·        
    In our new Strategic
    Plan 
    http://engc.org.uk/media/2311/strategic-report-2017.pdf   
    objectives 2 and 4 you will see we have plans to address
    this. 

     

    The areas you mention
    are also part of the Uff Review commissioned by the ICE, IET and
    IMechE and published by the Royal Academy of
    Engineering.  


    The working groups that
    came out of that review are already discussing the concerns you
    mention.

     

    Regarding your complaint
    to the IET
    ,

    the Engineering Council
    does not have any jurisdiction over the professional engineering
    institutions on the matters you raise regarding investigations into
    previous employers.  We are limited to the remit contained in
    our Charter and Byelaws and Regulations, which you can find
    here 


     

    Regards xxxxxxx
    For CEO ECUK

     

    I now hope that IET will
    engineer a future for all professional engineers of all genders,
    they have a lot of work to catch up on.



    John
    Gowman BA MIET.

Children
No Data