This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
No Data
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson
    Scott,

    Do not count on UK Government. 


    Secondly, schools are faced with a results problem, and the teaching staff have litle idea of what engineering or technology really means and what education and training our future technologists need. Like military staff, they apply, or are disciplined.

    The UK educational system (Wales has an optional  bacalaureate system) needs overhauling. I am reading those university courses I was not allowed to study when younger, I wish i had access to this knowledge earlier.

    Thee UK educational system needs to be broader before specialising. Engineers have a huge culture defficit unless they read after qualifying.


    How can the  careers advisers help children when confronted by the mass of uncordinated advisors that knock on their doors.

    How many PEIs advise, how many other professions advise ? It must be hundreds!


    We need not only a  A new model of high-value engineering education, we need a new model of UK  of high-value general education.


    I attended a UK experimental school, it was so good that the government closed the system down - a threat to private education.


    I have assisted in "European School" teaching which is about as good as any private school world wide. It costs nothing to run but upsets the status quo.


    As long as we have a discordinated array of technical institutes that represent less than 10% of the potential UK PEs we are going to achiev nothing at all.


    It is up to you to define and call for a  A new model of high-value engineering education.


    I was on holiday in France (A Concorde Rugby match actually-1968) when the French youth decided they had enough and wanted change.

    I am in France now when a young, well educated man decided "they" had enough and wanted change. - Mr Macron. There are no political parties in France to day, tFrance has had a silent revolution. His first priority is  A new model of high-value engineering education and apprenticeships.

    Keep up this line; but do as we did  at ITEME , amalgamate and reduce the PEIs to one democratic voice.

    The French LN has associated (no leagal ties) with the UK expats and other UK PEIs to meet and communicate.


    One thing is certain, the UK system cannot continue for long, as it is change that is needed and the "old guard" has to go.


    At UK Civil Service Management classes, our lecturer stated that he had given us the menu of the day. Then he said - all you have to do is communicate.


    We need one Technology voice, and  
     A new model of high-value engineering education.


    If you just talk about it on blogs the discussion will never end.


     - possitive action is required, take LN France as an example. No status but open communication.


    John Gowman
Children
No Data