This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
  • John,

    I think you hit the nail on the head with one of your comments:

    Thanks to my full engineering training from apprenticeship to taught masters, I have had the pleasure to work with the world’s most multi-disciplinary professional engineers with the world’s very best science, engineering and technology innovators, grouping the cutting-edge, thinkers and doers. It was not my suffix that counted it was my competences.



    I have to say that some of the best engineers I have met have gone through the route of starting with an apprenticeship and then developing with further education/qualifications. However the death knell of apprenticeships was sounded initially back in the early '60s when the UK government abolished conscription (doing an engineering apprenticeship deferred conscription, which with other later choices could be then completely avoided), though it took a few decades to fully decline. We now have a government trying to rebuild a system of apprenticeships, though it appears to me that the intention is to get people off the unemployment figures rather than boosing the countries engineering capabilities, so time will tell if this will make a difference.


    This of course brings us back to the original subject of this thread, a new model of high value engineering education. It seems to me that the new university plans to do what the government is not quite achieving, and I for one would be delighted to get engineers coming through who are as good as some of those I have worked with, though I suspect I will be retired before the new engineers start to make a difference.


    Alasdair Anderson
Reply
  • John,

    I think you hit the nail on the head with one of your comments:

    Thanks to my full engineering training from apprenticeship to taught masters, I have had the pleasure to work with the world’s most multi-disciplinary professional engineers with the world’s very best science, engineering and technology innovators, grouping the cutting-edge, thinkers and doers. It was not my suffix that counted it was my competences.



    I have to say that some of the best engineers I have met have gone through the route of starting with an apprenticeship and then developing with further education/qualifications. However the death knell of apprenticeships was sounded initially back in the early '60s when the UK government abolished conscription (doing an engineering apprenticeship deferred conscription, which with other later choices could be then completely avoided), though it took a few decades to fully decline. We now have a government trying to rebuild a system of apprenticeships, though it appears to me that the intention is to get people off the unemployment figures rather than boosing the countries engineering capabilities, so time will tell if this will make a difference.


    This of course brings us back to the original subject of this thread, a new model of high value engineering education. It seems to me that the new university plans to do what the government is not quite achieving, and I for one would be delighted to get engineers coming through who are as good as some of those I have worked with, though I suspect I will be retired before the new engineers start to make a difference.


    Alasdair Anderson
Children
No Data