This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents

  • Scott Williams:

    Hi Andy,


    .... The Government should encourage all engineering bodies and companies to get involved more with undergraduates which fortunately is happening (although very slowly). ...


    Best Regards, Scott




    Scott (and Andy),

    I agree with what you are saying, but with regard to the above, if engineering bodies and companies get involved more with undergraduates, they are already too late! The undergraduates have already chosen their courses, so involving them will not increase the number of engineering graduates. We need to catch them at school before they have made their choice to show them how rewarding (intellectually at least, perhaps also financially) such a career can be.


    We need to give the children of today the opportunity to learn enough to make their choices. As a start in this we have volunteers going to schools to talk to the children about engineering, which is something that wasn't around when I was at school - I ended up an engineer through a mixture of blind chance and nepotism, but had I known enough to make a sensible choice it is what I would have chosen.


    Best regards,


    Alasdair

Reply

  • Scott Williams:

    Hi Andy,


    .... The Government should encourage all engineering bodies and companies to get involved more with undergraduates which fortunately is happening (although very slowly). ...


    Best Regards, Scott




    Scott (and Andy),

    I agree with what you are saying, but with regard to the above, if engineering bodies and companies get involved more with undergraduates, they are already too late! The undergraduates have already chosen their courses, so involving them will not increase the number of engineering graduates. We need to catch them at school before they have made their choice to show them how rewarding (intellectually at least, perhaps also financially) such a career can be.


    We need to give the children of today the opportunity to learn enough to make their choices. As a start in this we have volunteers going to schools to talk to the children about engineering, which is something that wasn't around when I was at school - I ended up an engineer through a mixture of blind chance and nepotism, but had I known enough to make a sensible choice it is what I would have chosen.


    Best regards,


    Alasdair

Children
No Data