This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
Parents
  • Hi John,

    Thank you for your kind comments on my post. Following these I feel a bit mean picking you up on a point, but only because it could mislead:

    The MIETs have to join or remain in IET and the big three PEIs, as these three have managed to set up in the UK, an illegal, restrictive practice whereby to work as an engineer, you have to be a CEng. 




    As you make clear in your immediately following comments, this has not in fact happened - the vast majority of engineers are (sadly in my view) not professionally registered whilst still being employed. But the point I really wanted to make is that, as far as I am aware, in UK law an employer could perfectly legally require its staff to be CEng. Just as it could require them to all hold PhDs or full driving licences - or (a very common bit of daftness) be experts on a particular CAD system. UK employment law is based on very specific factors that you must not discriminate against:



    • age

    • being or becoming a transsexual person

    • being married or in a civil partnership

    • being pregnant or on maternity leave

    • disability

    • race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin

    • religion, belief or lack of religion/belief

    • sex

    • sexual orientation

    www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights


    Beyond this employers can set any requirements they like. It's into contract law (what happens if you employ someone with a full driving licence and they then get banned) and market forces. For the vast majority of employers market forces mean they simply can't afford to restrict their workforce to CEngs. But if they think they can, that's their choice.


    Of all the UK professions engineering is possibly the least restrictive regarding professional membership - just as it is with academic qualifications. This has good sides and bad sides.


    Thanks, Andy


Reply
  • Hi John,

    Thank you for your kind comments on my post. Following these I feel a bit mean picking you up on a point, but only because it could mislead:

    The MIETs have to join or remain in IET and the big three PEIs, as these three have managed to set up in the UK, an illegal, restrictive practice whereby to work as an engineer, you have to be a CEng. 




    As you make clear in your immediately following comments, this has not in fact happened - the vast majority of engineers are (sadly in my view) not professionally registered whilst still being employed. But the point I really wanted to make is that, as far as I am aware, in UK law an employer could perfectly legally require its staff to be CEng. Just as it could require them to all hold PhDs or full driving licences - or (a very common bit of daftness) be experts on a particular CAD system. UK employment law is based on very specific factors that you must not discriminate against:



    • age

    • being or becoming a transsexual person

    • being married or in a civil partnership

    • being pregnant or on maternity leave

    • disability

    • race including colour, nationality, ethnic or national origin

    • religion, belief or lack of religion/belief

    • sex

    • sexual orientation

    www.gov.uk/discrimination-your-rights


    Beyond this employers can set any requirements they like. It's into contract law (what happens if you employ someone with a full driving licence and they then get banned) and market forces. For the vast majority of employers market forces mean they simply can't afford to restrict their workforce to CEngs. But if they think they can, that's their choice.


    Of all the UK professions engineering is possibly the least restrictive regarding professional membership - just as it is with academic qualifications. This has good sides and bad sides.


    Thanks, Andy


Children
No Data