This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

A new model of high-value engineering education

Following on from the UK Engineering Report 2016 (and the discussion of same in this forum) and the adequacy or not of current efforts to educate and train, and to encourage the registration of our future engineers, I am intrigued about a “new model in technology and engineering” (NMiTE http://www.nmite.org.uk). It is a new University that is to focus on the teaching of engineering.

In a recent press release, it says:  


“At NMiTE we believe that engineering education can be different.
We’re here to unlock the creativity and drive of Britain’s next generation – the Passioneers – the designers and builders, problem solvers and innovators who will shape our future.


We’re establishing a new model of high-value engineering education:


  • Creating a beacon institution to help address the engineering skills shortage that threatens to hobble the UK’s ability to compete globally.

  • With a new approach to learning – based on real-world problem solving and the blending of high quality engineering, design, liberal arts and humanities with communication and employability skills targeted at the growth sectors of the future.

  • Located on a new and different type of campus – designed for inspiration, collaboration and a deep connection to the global community.

  • And reinforced by an innovation ecosystem of global corporations & SME entrepreneurs, coupled with global universities, not just to invest, but to contribute knowledge and expertise – with New Model students at its centre.

We’re shaping an institution to create and deliver 21st century engineers – catalysts for innovation and change – a new model generation of emotionally intelligent entrepreneurs, innovators, employees and leaders for the future."


Two things strike me as very different about this proposition:

  1. Its motto is “no lectures, no exams, no text books” (!). It plans to be very practically-based, largely conducted within real industry.

Apparently, it will also have no departments, no faculties, no tenure, no Council.  Instead, it’ll have “teaching teams designed around the delivery of our unique engineering and Human Interaction curriculum” (developed by an impressive, international, and overwhelmingly academic array of advisors and partners).


  1. It’s located in the city of Hereford (admittedly partly a personal one as a resident of Herefordshire for over 30 years). 

It is a city by virtue of its cathedral but it is one of the smaller cities in the UK with a population of just over 50k, and is in England's first or second most rural county (depending on how you rank it). Hereford’s engineering heritage is largely unremarkable as it is known more for its agricultural and food output (beef, potatoes, strawberries, apples, cider(!), beer, etc.) and of being home to the UK's elite special forces regiments. It has engineering history in munitions production from during WWII and it's current engineering association is with food production, double-glazing, Morgan chassis and JCB cab manufacture, insulation material forming, and that’s largely it. So, not the most obvious choice to base a new Advanced Engineering University then!


The NMiTE project has been described (The Times 6th Sep 2016) as “at worst an intriguing experiment and at best an innovative template that traditional universities might learn from”.

What do you think?


As an aside, I have seen nothing of NMiTE in these forums or indeed on the IET website – yet, apparently (and quite rightly) the IET has been an advisor/contributor/supporter.


As a footnote, I would very much like to reach out and connect with any IET members/fellows that are/have been involved in NMiTE with a view of my getting involved too.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,

    No one is
    interested in engineering in MIET, just look at the Future
    Engineering blogs, very few subjects very few views, no
    comments.

    Engineers
    must be able to identify ambitious projects from factual
    engineering reality.




    If they
    had a good education then they would be able to see for them
    selves.

    Why is it
    that an old (RIP) businessman and Lord of the Realm can question
    fake technology and not Engineers?




    These
    blogs are just for insisting on ones point of view and protecting a
    false status recognised nowhere outside of the UK.

    I helped
    start and run a good PEI, it is now an elitist club that is
    blocking the people of our status when we created Engineering &
    Technology.

    As a
    stake holder, I want to see the members respected, not
    denigrated.




    No point
    in wasting any more time.




    What are
    the active members doing to improve education, training for all,
    both genders from technician to PhD and long route included.




    Some good
    ideas have been mentioned, but do members really care.

    They have
    their CEng badge which opens UK doors; those that are not CEng have
    the door closed on them even if they have more experience and
    qualifications.




    I will
    never accept peer review it is biased and subjective. 

    I have
    witnessed too much Fraud and corruption in engineering which in the
    UK you would not believe, I do not want it creeping into IET.




    I have
    been coerced into situations which even V V our Rusian journalist
    would find hard to believe. 




    I want to
    see IET back on the rails with respect for all members.




    John
    Gowman



  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,

    No one is
    interested in engineering in MIET, just look at the Future
    Engineering blogs, very few subjects very few views, no
    comments.

    Engineers
    must be able to identify ambitious projects from factual
    engineering reality.




    If they
    had a good education then they would be able to see for them
    selves.

    Why is it
    that an old (RIP) businessman and Lord of the Realm can question
    fake technology and not Engineers?




    These
    blogs are just for insisting on ones point of view and protecting a
    false status recognised nowhere outside of the UK.

    I helped
    start and run a good PEI, it is now an elitist club that is
    blocking the people of our status when we created Engineering &
    Technology.

    As a
    stake holder, I want to see the members respected, not
    denigrated.




    No point
    in wasting any more time.




    What are
    the active members doing to improve education, training for all,
    both genders from technician to PhD and long route included.




    Some good
    ideas have been mentioned, but do members really care.

    They have
    their CEng badge which opens UK doors; those that are not CEng have
    the door closed on them even if they have more experience and
    qualifications.




    I will
    never accept peer review it is biased and subjective. 

    I have
    witnessed too much Fraud and corruption in engineering which in the
    UK you would not believe, I do not want it creeping into IET.




    I have
    been coerced into situations which even V V our Rusian journalist
    would find hard to believe. 




    I want to
    see IET back on the rails with respect for all members.




    John
    Gowman



  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,

    No one is
    interested in engineering in MIET, just look at the Future
    Engineering blogs, very few subjects very few views, no
    comments.

    Engineers
    must be able to identify ambitious projects from factual
    engineering reality.




    If they
    had a good education then they would be able to see for them
    selves.

    Why is it
    that an old (RIP) businessman and Lord of the Realm can question
    fake technology and not Engineers?




    These
    blogs are just for insisting on ones point of view and protecting a
    false status recognised nowhere outside of the UK.

    I helped
    start and run a good PEI, it is now an elitist club that is
    blocking the people of our status when we created Engineering &
    Technology.

    As a
    stake holder, I want to see the members respected, not
    denigrated.




    No point
    in wasting any more time.




    What are
    the active members doing to improve education, training for all,
    both genders from technician to PhD and long route included.




    Some good
    ideas have been mentioned, but do members really care.

    They have
    their CEng badge which opens UK doors; those that are not CEng have
    the door closed on them even if they have more experience and
    qualifications.




    I will
    never accept peer review it is biased and subjective. 

    I have
    witnessed too much Fraud and corruption in engineering which in the
    UK you would not believe, I do not want it creeping into IET.




    I have
    been coerced into situations which even V V our Rusian journalist
    would find hard to believe. 




    I want to
    see IET back on the rails with respect for all members.




    John
    Gowman



  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,

    No one is
    interested in engineering in MIET, just look at the Future
    Engineering blogs, very few subjects very few views, no
    comments.

    Engineers
    must be able to identify ambitious projects from factual
    engineering reality.




    If they
    had a good education then they would be able to see for them
    selves.

    Why is it
    that an old (RIP) businessman and Lord of the Realm can question
    fake technology and not Engineers?




    These
    blogs are just for insisting on ones point of view and protecting a
    false status recognised nowhere outside of the UK.

    I helped
    start and run a good PEI, it is now an elitist club that is
    blocking the people of our status when we created Engineering &
    Technology.

    As a
    stake holder, I want to see the members respected, not
    denigrated.




    No point
    in wasting any more time.




    What are
    the active members doing to improve education, training for all,
    both genders from technician to PhD and long route included.




    Some good
    ideas have been mentioned, but do members really care.

    They have
    their CEng badge which opens UK doors; those that are not CEng have
    the door closed on them even if they have more experience and
    qualifications.




    I will
    never accept peer review it is biased and subjective. 

    I have
    witnessed too much Fraud and corruption in engineering which in the
    UK you would not believe, I do not want it creeping into IET.




    I have
    been coerced into situations which even V V our Rusian journalist
    would find hard to believe. 




    I want to
    see IET back on the rails with respect for all members.




    John
    Gowman



  • John,

    If you want to discuss fusion power please start a new thread.

    Thanks, Andy

  • Roy Bowdler:


    I don’t favour state intervention, but if it took government action to grow higher and degree apprenticeships back from a very low base, then it may take more to ensure equal access to professional recognition. If we believe that what we already have is fair, then the market is broken, because most developing engineers and technicians are not seeing a benefit. I often hear from Chartered Engineers who came up “the hard way” or “the long way”, but for every one of them there are probably two or three similar others who “lost the way”, despite often successful careers in engineering and related management. 

     




    To be slightly contrary (since you know that I basically agree with you Roy!), I don't see the market as broken, just that most of the market doesn't see the need for professional registration. I also don't see that this necessarily means that professional registration is broken, just that it may only be crucial for a subset of the market. And that could be seen as sufficient. As I've said many a time, when I worked in the pro-audio/broadcast industry there was no value seen in registration. Now I work in a safety-critical industry there is a perceived value: employers need to show not just that their staff are technically competent but also that they work in a competent way. And I think think that's been the attitude that's permeated the engineering community.


    Now to be self-contrary, I actually disagree with this viewpoint. Looking back, I think in my previous industry we would have delivered better products, better value, and more profitability if our engineering had followed the UK Spec guidance, and the best way of highlighting the guidance is to get as many staff as possible to go for registration. 


    What I find highly frustrating is that I personally believe that the system we have now IS fair, but it is also daunting and is not valued by employers. Volunteering as a PRA helps a bit with the first one, but the second is far more difficult. But Roy, what did you mean by "...it may take more to ensure equal access to professional recognition"? In what way do you think equal access is not currently ensured?


    I think all this does pull together with the thread of this discussion (phew!). The "sell" for the EC and Institutes should, to my mind, be that a model of excellence in engineering is structured education and / or training, post education / training experience, and then support to demonstrating that a level of overall engineering and business professionalism has been achieved through reaching the appropriate registration grade.


    Easy wink


    Just had a thought - I would like to see the Institutes doing more to support engineers in developing (not just showing) these professional skills. It would be interesting to know whether engineers have found the courses etc offered by the IET useful - and indeed, if they knew they were there. If the IET was seen as somewhere where graduates / ex-apprentices could be seen to keep visiting to develop their professional skills then we might be taken more seriously by commercial engineering employers - make the "professional home for life" a reality. At the moment I find the professional development page www.theiet.org/.../ very weak in this area, to me it reinforces the idea that we are the gatekeeper for registration, not actually a body to support engineers in becoming more professional. There don't seem to be many courses listed there, and little in the way of web based advice. But I did only look quickly.


    Cheers, Andy

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,


     He's a very
    interesting and inspirational speaker, and it includes a neat
    summary of fusion research.


    This is
    precisly what I am aiming at. (THERMO-NUCLEAR FUSION
    PLASMA RESEARCH)

    To be able to
    understand and to see the deliberate faults in his speach, you need
    a PhD in Plasma physics and about 7 years practice.

    He convinces
    everyone.



    In a new
    model of high value engineering, a well accomplished engineer would
    see for himself flaws in the ex UKAEA CCFE CEO's
    marketing presentation. He is an excellent at speaking and
    theoretical physics having been to the best schools in those
    domains. He had a high-value physics
    education; 
    he is not an engineer.




    He does
    not talk of Fusion Electrical Power, he talks about plasma physics
    energy.

    Plasma
    physics will soon be harnesed but for short periods probable in the
    new design tokamaks and other plasma physics machines , there is a
    lecture at IET this end of year see my comments on Future IET Community Energy
    Blogs
    . that's where technical discusions should be but no one
    at IET is interested.

    These
    tokamaks will be an ideal neutron souce that can be used for
    nuclear physics - neutronic research, producing medical radioactive
    isotopes and advance substrates for electronic micro circuits
    etc.




    No one
    talks of a Fusion Electrical Power Plant.




    The UKAEA
    CCFE CEO had to explain to the House of Lords their Fusion NPP
    project.

    There is
    not one.

    It was
    clearly stated that DEMO has not been designed as they need results
    from ITER which is as usual over budget and late; ITER is only
    expected to show that the plasma physics reaction can be
    controlled, be positive above factor 1 (10 is the objective) and
    this for some period over one hour. (After 70 years R&D).




    Fusion on
    earth is electro-magnetic confinement. The sun is fusion caused and
    controlled by Gravity.

    Therefore
    we will not have the sun in a bottle, we have a very difficult to
    control magnetic bottle.

    Every
    neutron will be captured by a Lithium atom giving Tritium fuel and
    energy. This is perpetual motion, to produce Tritium you need a
    Fission reactor close at hand. Hence it is nuclear waste.

    No
    nuclear waste in Fusion, except for the 3000 tons of steel and the
    buildings containing Pico quantities of Europium.

    Lithium
    is available from sea water.

    Wow car
    batteries available forever!  

    Where is
    the lithium sea water extraction plant; quickly invest there to
    make a fortune.





    Respecting other complaints on this blog I will not give any
    further quotes just read the House of Lords Grilling of
    Fusion. 

    The CEO
    UKAEA resigned after that.




    An
    engineer should be able to see the difference between Thermal power
    and Electrical Power, unfortunately it seems that CEng registration
    is more important than Practical engineering..




    The
    Fusion lobby are tking everyone for a ride, those that standup to
    it are demolished. see my past blogs.

    We need
     high-value
    engineering education
     to be able to determine for
    ourselves. If we believe everything that university professors tell
    us then there is no hope for engineers.




    "The
    apprentice master said that when the apprentice masters the trade
    and is better better than I am; then my job is done".




    Have I
    insulted someone?

    I will
    not stoop to comment on the previous blogs, the person has never
    replied to any of my emails, he should retire to leave the running
    of our PEI to its active members. 




    We need a
    broad range of high quality engineering education not just
    elitist preferences. 

    Do we
    have the tools for such a task? Maybe we need  to engineer high-value engineering
    education -
    in France, just today, that is what the government
    said. 

    We can do
    the same.




    All
    practitioners in engineering & technology are to be respected,
    it is the whole, the team that makes a sound project.



    I have
    resigned my ECUK IEng it was a burden.

    Can I
    bring IET back to its original objectives - no; but you can.




    Fake
    reporting, Fake technology please no Fake engineers.

    The BBC
    report is just Fusion lobbying, they have no mathematical model for
    a Fusion NPP. Prove me wrong, show me the model.




    John
    Gowman

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,


     He's a very
    interesting and inspirational speaker, and it includes a neat
    summary of fusion research.


    This is
    precisly what I am aiming at. (THERMO-NUCLEAR FUSION
    PLASMA RESEARCH)

    To be able to
    understand and to see the deliberate faults in his speach, you need
    a PhD in Plasma physics and about 7 years practice.

    He convinces
    everyone.



    In a new
    model of high value engineering, a well accomplished engineer would
    see for himself flaws in the ex UKAEA CCFE CEO's
    marketing presentation. He is an excellent at speaking and
    theoretical physics having been to the best schools in those
    domains. He had a high-value physics
    education; 
    he is not an engineer.




    He does
    not talk of Fusion Electrical Power, he talks about plasma physics
    energy.

    Plasma
    physics will soon be harnesed but for short periods probable in the
    new design tokamaks and other plasma physics machines , there is a
    lecture at IET this end of year see my comments on Future IET Community Energy
    Blogs
    . that's where technical discusions should be but no one
    at IET is interested.

    These
    tokamaks will be an ideal neutron souce that can be used for
    nuclear physics - neutronic research, producing medical radioactive
    isotopes and advance substrates for electronic micro circuits
    etc.




    No one
    talks of a Fusion Electrical Power Plant.




    The UKAEA
    CCFE CEO had to explain to the House of Lords their Fusion NPP
    project.

    There is
    not one.

    It was
    clearly stated that DEMO has not been designed as they need results
    from ITER which is as usual over budget and late; ITER is only
    expected to show that the plasma physics reaction can be
    controlled, be positive above factor 1 (10 is the objective) and
    this for some period over one hour. (After 70 years R&D).




    Fusion on
    earth is electro-magnetic confinement. The sun is fusion caused and
    controlled by Gravity.

    Therefore
    we will not have the sun in a bottle, we have a very difficult to
    control magnetic bottle.

    Every
    neutron will be captured by a Lithium atom giving Tritium fuel and
    energy. This is perpetual motion, to produce Tritium you need a
    Fission reactor close at hand. Hence it is nuclear waste.

    No
    nuclear waste in Fusion, except for the 3000 tons of steel and the
    buildings containing Pico quantities of Europium.

    Lithium
    is available from sea water.

    Wow car
    batteries available forever!  

    Where is
    the lithium sea water extraction plant; quickly invest there to
    make a fortune.





    Respecting other complaints on this blog I will not give any
    further quotes just read the House of Lords Grilling of
    Fusion. 

    The CEO
    UKAEA resigned after that.




    An
    engineer should be able to see the difference between Thermal power
    and Electrical Power, unfortunately it seems that CEng registration
    is more important than Practical engineering..




    The
    Fusion lobby are tking everyone for a ride, those that standup to
    it are demolished. see my past blogs.

    We need
     high-value
    engineering education
     to be able to determine for
    ourselves. If we believe everything that university professors tell
    us then there is no hope for engineers.




    "The
    apprentice master said that when the apprentice masters the trade
    and is better better than I am; then my job is done".




    Have I
    insulted someone?

    I will
    not stoop to comment on the previous blogs, the person has never
    replied to any of my emails, he should retire to leave the running
    of our PEI to its active members. 




    We need a
    broad range of high quality engineering education not just
    elitist preferences. 

    Do we
    have the tools for such a task? Maybe we need  to engineer high-value engineering
    education -
    in France, just today, that is what the government
    said. 

    We can do
    the same.




    All
    practitioners in engineering & technology are to be respected,
    it is the whole, the team that makes a sound project.



    I have
    resigned my ECUK IEng it was a burden.

    Can I
    bring IET back to its original objectives - no; but you can.




    Fake
    reporting, Fake technology please no Fake engineers.

    The BBC
    report is just Fusion lobbying, they have no mathematical model for
    a Fusion NPP. Prove me wrong, show me the model.




    John
    Gowman

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,


     He's a very
    interesting and inspirational speaker, and it includes a neat
    summary of fusion research.


    This is
    precisly what I am aiming at. (THERMO-NUCLEAR FUSION
    PLASMA RESEARCH)

    To be able to
    understand and to see the deliberate faults in his speach, you need
    a PhD in Plasma physics and about 7 years practice.

    He convinces
    everyone.



    In a new
    model of high value engineering, a well accomplished engineer would
    see for himself flaws in the ex UKAEA CCFE CEO's
    marketing presentation. He is an excellent at speaking and
    theoretical physics having been to the best schools in those
    domains. He had a high-value physics
    education; 
    he is not an engineer.




    He does
    not talk of Fusion Electrical Power, he talks about plasma physics
    energy.

    Plasma
    physics will soon be harnesed but for short periods probable in the
    new design tokamaks and other plasma physics machines , there is a
    lecture at IET this end of year see my comments on Future IET Community Energy
    Blogs
    . that's where technical discusions should be but no one
    at IET is interested.

    These
    tokamaks will be an ideal neutron souce that can be used for
    nuclear physics - neutronic research, producing medical radioactive
    isotopes and advance substrates for electronic micro circuits
    etc.




    No one
    talks of a Fusion Electrical Power Plant.




    The UKAEA
    CCFE CEO had to explain to the House of Lords their Fusion NPP
    project.

    There is
    not one.

    It was
    clearly stated that DEMO has not been designed as they need results
    from ITER which is as usual over budget and late; ITER is only
    expected to show that the plasma physics reaction can be
    controlled, be positive above factor 1 (10 is the objective) and
    this for some period over one hour. (After 70 years R&D).




    Fusion on
    earth is electro-magnetic confinement. The sun is fusion caused and
    controlled by Gravity.

    Therefore
    we will not have the sun in a bottle, we have a very difficult to
    control magnetic bottle.

    Every
    neutron will be captured by a Lithium atom giving Tritium fuel and
    energy. This is perpetual motion, to produce Tritium you need a
    Fission reactor close at hand. Hence it is nuclear waste.

    No
    nuclear waste in Fusion, except for the 3000 tons of steel and the
    buildings containing Pico quantities of Europium.

    Lithium
    is available from sea water.

    Wow car
    batteries available forever!  

    Where is
    the lithium sea water extraction plant; quickly invest there to
    make a fortune.





    Respecting other complaints on this blog I will not give any
    further quotes just read the House of Lords Grilling of
    Fusion. 

    The CEO
    UKAEA resigned after that.




    An
    engineer should be able to see the difference between Thermal power
    and Electrical Power, unfortunately it seems that CEng registration
    is more important than Practical engineering..




    The
    Fusion lobby are tking everyone for a ride, those that standup to
    it are demolished. see my past blogs.

    We need
     high-value
    engineering education
     to be able to determine for
    ourselves. If we believe everything that university professors tell
    us then there is no hope for engineers.




    "The
    apprentice master said that when the apprentice masters the trade
    and is better better than I am; then my job is done".




    Have I
    insulted someone?

    I will
    not stoop to comment on the previous blogs, the person has never
    replied to any of my emails, he should retire to leave the running
    of our PEI to its active members. 




    We need a
    broad range of high quality engineering education not just
    elitist preferences. 

    Do we
    have the tools for such a task? Maybe we need  to engineer high-value engineering
    education -
    in France, just today, that is what the government
    said. 

    We can do
    the same.




    All
    practitioners in engineering & technology are to be respected,
    it is the whole, the team that makes a sound project.



    I have
    resigned my ECUK IEng it was a burden.

    Can I
    bring IET back to its original objectives - no; but you can.




    Fake
    reporting, Fake technology please no Fake engineers.

    The BBC
    report is just Fusion lobbying, they have no mathematical model for
    a Fusion NPP. Prove me wrong, show me the model.




    John
    Gowman

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member in reply to Chris Pearson

    Andy,


     He's a very
    interesting and inspirational speaker, and it includes a neat
    summary of fusion research.


    This is
    precisly what I am aiming at. (THERMO-NUCLEAR FUSION
    PLASMA RESEARCH)

    To be able to
    understand and to see the deliberate faults in his speach, you need
    a PhD in Plasma physics and about 7 years practice.

    He convinces
    everyone.



    In a new
    model of high value engineering, a well accomplished engineer would
    see for himself flaws in the ex UKAEA CCFE CEO's
    marketing presentation. He is an excellent at speaking and
    theoretical physics having been to the best schools in those
    domains. He had a high-value physics
    education; 
    he is not an engineer.




    He does
    not talk of Fusion Electrical Power, he talks about plasma physics
    energy.

    Plasma
    physics will soon be harnesed but for short periods probable in the
    new design tokamaks and other plasma physics machines , there is a
    lecture at IET this end of year see my comments on Future IET Community Energy
    Blogs
    . that's where technical discusions should be but no one
    at IET is interested.

    These
    tokamaks will be an ideal neutron souce that can be used for
    nuclear physics - neutronic research, producing medical radioactive
    isotopes and advance substrates for electronic micro circuits
    etc.




    No one
    talks of a Fusion Electrical Power Plant.




    The UKAEA
    CCFE CEO had to explain to the House of Lords their Fusion NPP
    project.

    There is
    not one.

    It was
    clearly stated that DEMO has not been designed as they need results
    from ITER which is as usual over budget and late; ITER is only
    expected to show that the plasma physics reaction can be
    controlled, be positive above factor 1 (10 is the objective) and
    this for some period over one hour. (After 70 years R&D).




    Fusion on
    earth is electro-magnetic confinement. The sun is fusion caused and
    controlled by Gravity.

    Therefore
    we will not have the sun in a bottle, we have a very difficult to
    control magnetic bottle.

    Every
    neutron will be captured by a Lithium atom giving Tritium fuel and
    energy. This is perpetual motion, to produce Tritium you need a
    Fission reactor close at hand. Hence it is nuclear waste.

    No
    nuclear waste in Fusion, except for the 3000 tons of steel and the
    buildings containing Pico quantities of Europium.

    Lithium
    is available from sea water.

    Wow car
    batteries available forever!  

    Where is
    the lithium sea water extraction plant; quickly invest there to
    make a fortune.





    Respecting other complaints on this blog I will not give any
    further quotes just read the House of Lords Grilling of
    Fusion. 

    The CEO
    UKAEA resigned after that.




    An
    engineer should be able to see the difference between Thermal power
    and Electrical Power, unfortunately it seems that CEng registration
    is more important than Practical engineering..




    The
    Fusion lobby are tking everyone for a ride, those that standup to
    it are demolished. see my past blogs.

    We need
     high-value
    engineering education
     to be able to determine for
    ourselves. If we believe everything that university professors tell
    us then there is no hope for engineers.




    "The
    apprentice master said that when the apprentice masters the trade
    and is better better than I am; then my job is done".




    Have I
    insulted someone?

    I will
    not stoop to comment on the previous blogs, the person has never
    replied to any of my emails, he should retire to leave the running
    of our PEI to its active members. 




    We need a
    broad range of high quality engineering education not just
    elitist preferences. 

    Do we
    have the tools for such a task? Maybe we need  to engineer high-value engineering
    education -
    in France, just today, that is what the government
    said. 

    We can do
    the same.




    All
    practitioners in engineering & technology are to be respected,
    it is the whole, the team that makes a sound project.



    I have
    resigned my ECUK IEng it was a burden.

    Can I
    bring IET back to its original objectives - no; but you can.




    Fake
    reporting, Fake technology please no Fake engineers.

    The BBC
    report is just Fusion lobbying, they have no mathematical model for
    a Fusion NPP. Prove me wrong, show me the model.




    John
    Gowman