Thank you Peter - I can see the truth of your forecast for the future. Whether we qualified or not (my home did not) - we all paid through increased energy tariffs for the 'free' loft insulation to be topped up to reach 270 mm of mineral wool. We are all still paying for the 'free' smart meter 'roll out'. My feeling is that my solar powered wrist watch is an 'appropriate' use of technology, as is my solar powered PIR security lamp outside my back door. I.E. their functionality is wholly independent of any external source of energy (save that used in their manufacture and eventual eco - friendly disposal/recycling at end of their useful life). However, upwards of 10 million x 75Kg employees in the UK driving to work each day in 1500 Kg motor vehicles is clearly an unsustainable modern luxury - regardless of the motive force (Petrol or Diesel ICE or BEV or Hydrogen/Battery/Hybrid etc). Such behaviour was unaffordable for most families in the early 1960s when hoards of cyclists could be seen streaming away from the local factories at 5 pm every weekday. In essence, the use of motoer cars to travel to work is NOT an Appropriate use of technology. I do not advocate widespread 'working from home' (due to the  inevitable domestic distractions) other than as a temporary measure on a transition path to the building of fully equipped local telecommunications centres for 'remote working' for all those who typically spend all day on the phone and/or on a desktop PC. Recent events re cyber attacks on major corporate servers and valuable central databases - show that the current obsession with a centralised office working environment is not actually inherently more secure than distributed/remote client-server arrangements. Surely it is up to UK Government (and global governments) to step up and take the lead in this and insist that corporate employers provide/facilitate/encourage 'remote working' whenever and where ever feasible as appropriate - if we really want to substantially reduce the current excessive generation of CO2, NOx, Particulates etc in an attempt to stabilise our climate and improve air quality ?

.

Thank you Peter - I can see the truth of your forecast for the future. Whether we qualified or not (my home did not) - we all paid through increased energy tariffs for the 'free' loft insulation to be topped up to reach 270 mm of mineral wool. We are all still paying for the 'free' smart meter 'roll out'. My feeling is that my solar powered wrist watch is an 'appropriate' use of technology, as is my solar powered PIR security lamp outside my back door. I.E. their functionality is wholly independent of any external source of energy (save that used in their manufacture and eventual eco - friendly disposal/recycling at end of their useful life). However, upwards of 10 million x 75Kg employees in the UK driving to work each day in 1500 Kg motor vehicles is clearly an unsustainable modern luxury - regardless of the motive force (Petrol or Diesel ICE or BEV or Hydrogen/Battery/Hybrid etc). Such behaviour was unaffordable for most families in the early 1960s when hoards of cyclists could be seen streaming away from the local factories at 5 pm every weekday. In essence, the use of motoer cars to travel to work is NOT an Appropriate use of technology. I do not advocate widespread 'working from home' (due to the  inevitable domestic distractions) other than as a temporary measure on a transition path to the building of fully equipped local telecommunications centres for 'remote working' for all those who typically spend all day on the phone and/or on a desktop PC. Recent events re cyber attacks on major corporate servers and valuable central databases - show that the current obsession with a centralised office working environment is not actually inherently more secure than distributed/remote client-server arrangements. Surely it is up to UK Government (and global governments) to step up and take the lead in this and insist that corporate employers provide/facilitate/encourage 'remote working' whenever and where ever feasible as appropriate - if we really want to substantially reduce the current excessive generation of CO2, NOx, Particulates etc in an attempt to stabilise our climate and improve air quality ?

.