This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

VW Emissions Scandal & Speaking Out

A VW engineer has been sentenced to jail for his part in the scandal...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41053740


Although the court recognised that he was not the mastermind behind it they cited his failure to speak out as one of the reasons for imposing a harsher sentence. By my reckoning, if they are going to give this engineer a harsh sentence then a large number of other engineers and managers are also up for some significant jail time (don't forget VW are not the only car maker caught out by this). Don't forget that within just a single design/project team:
  • The initial requirements specification would have been signed off by multiple people.

  • The code would have likely been authored by more than one engineer.

  • The architecture and code would have been reviewed thoroughly and signed off by others who did not design or code it.

  • There would have been a final engineering sign off by the chief engineer and/or the technical director prior to release for production.

  • That is quite a number of people who could have spoken out but didn't (or they didn't do their jobs properly when reviewing and signing off)



My question is how many engineers (or non-engineers) wokring within a company have the confidence to speak out against something they feel is wrong or unethical without fear of retribution or even constructive dismissal?


I have so far only come across one employer (not directly automotive industry) that clearly has some explicit policies in place to encourage their people to feel that they can speak out and where retribution against an employee in any form is treated very seriously and could lead to dismissal. Clearly the emissions scandal is a wake up call for the automotive industry to change the way their companies operate. However, there is an opportunity for all companies with an engineering function to learn from this.


We all know that as engineers we have a duty to operate in an ethical manner but are we supported enough by engineering institutions globally to do that? What role can the engineering institutions and government play in helping to make it easier for engineers to speak up? Legal and government representation if an engineer is treated unfairly or even dismissed as a result of speaking out? What other tools could be made available to engineers by the engineering institutions (IET, Engineering Council, Royal Academy of Engineering, etc) to help them speak out more confidently without fear of retribution from their employer or line management?


Parents
  • Gareth - I'm not sure if he was licensed to practice engineering or not in California or Michigan.
    Click here to look up California Professional Licensees.  I'm not sure how to look up PE's in Michigan.

    For those with interest in this topic and its implications for corporate governance and the protection of shareholder value, here are some intersting resources to learn more:
    Helping Employees Raise Concerns (Volume 7, Issue 2, International Business Ethics Review)
    A Global Perspective on Whistleblowing by Lori Tansey Martens and Amber Kelleher
    Maintaining Effective Helplines by Roland Riebl
    Installing an Effective Helpline
    International Whistleblowing Legislation

    International Standards and Global Codes (Volume 8, Issue 1,
    International Business Ethics Review)
    Are Standards Becoming Standard Operating Procedures? An International Update by Dr. Anita B. Baker

    Writing an Effective Global Code of Conduct by Lori Tansey Martens


    The strength of a company's internal controls and anti-retaliation policy for whistleblowers (or its absence) and the independence of the chief ethics officer, or compliance officer, is often a good indicator of a company's ethics and the likelyhood that problems will come to light before they destroy too much shareholder value.
Reply
  • Gareth - I'm not sure if he was licensed to practice engineering or not in California or Michigan.
    Click here to look up California Professional Licensees.  I'm not sure how to look up PE's in Michigan.

    For those with interest in this topic and its implications for corporate governance and the protection of shareholder value, here are some intersting resources to learn more:
    Helping Employees Raise Concerns (Volume 7, Issue 2, International Business Ethics Review)
    A Global Perspective on Whistleblowing by Lori Tansey Martens and Amber Kelleher
    Maintaining Effective Helplines by Roland Riebl
    Installing an Effective Helpline
    International Whistleblowing Legislation

    International Standards and Global Codes (Volume 8, Issue 1,
    International Business Ethics Review)
    Are Standards Becoming Standard Operating Procedures? An International Update by Dr. Anita B. Baker

    Writing an Effective Global Code of Conduct by Lori Tansey Martens


    The strength of a company's internal controls and anti-retaliation policy for whistleblowers (or its absence) and the independence of the chief ethics officer, or compliance officer, is often a good indicator of a company's ethics and the likelyhood that problems will come to light before they destroy too much shareholder value.
Children
No Data