This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

It Just Is

I wonder how much of what we 'know' has ever been properly explained? Our teachers repeat what they have been taught and our text books are re-writes of earlier text books. Perhaps that is the way to pass exams, don't think about what is missing, just repeat what was taught and so it goes on.


Lately I have been looking through some of my old 'how it works' books from my childhood, encyclopedias, atlases and 'online' to see what they say about the Earth's seasons. At least they all agree! It is all down to the tilt of the Earth's axis, the northern hemisphere points towards the Sun in the summer and away from the Sun in winter. Simple! We don't need to know anything more.


A simple experiment: Take a dinner plate and place an apple near the rim with its stalk pointing slightly towards the centre, a model of the tilted Earth. Now slowly and carefully twist the plate on top of a table so as not to disturb the apple until the plate has turned through 180 degrees. Now which way is the apple pointing? Do you still understand the seasons or did you have a book/teacher that really explained it? Perhaps you are a heretic and thought for yourself? Andy Millar raised some of these issues in "You don't need practical skills to be an engineer", 'knowing' how to do something can stop new thinking.


Have a virtual mug of coffee and think about it!
Parents
  • I must admit that I'd completely forgotten this bit about the area covered by the suns rays at different heights...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_of_Sun_angle_on_climate


    But regarding simplicity of explanation in school books, as many of you know I've done a lot of voluntary STEM work in schools, and it is a real challenge to make explanations which are "correct" but don't rely on considerable background knowledge. So I do have sympathy with explanations that leave information out, a good explanation needs to be a pyramid that gives the opportunity to get wider and fuller depending on the expertise and interest of the student. I see this from the other side when discussing biology with my daughter who's currently a PhD student, her first response to almost any point on genes, DNA, microorganisms etc is "well, actually it's a bit more complicated than that"!


    Interesting point,


    Cheers,


    Andy

Reply
  • I must admit that I'd completely forgotten this bit about the area covered by the suns rays at different heights...
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_of_Sun_angle_on_climate


    But regarding simplicity of explanation in school books, as many of you know I've done a lot of voluntary STEM work in schools, and it is a real challenge to make explanations which are "correct" but don't rely on considerable background knowledge. So I do have sympathy with explanations that leave information out, a good explanation needs to be a pyramid that gives the opportunity to get wider and fuller depending on the expertise and interest of the student. I see this from the other side when discussing biology with my daughter who's currently a PhD student, her first response to almost any point on genes, DNA, microorganisms etc is "well, actually it's a bit more complicated than that"!


    Interesting point,


    Cheers,


    Andy

Children
No Data