This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

It Just Is

I wonder how much of what we 'know' has ever been properly explained? Our teachers repeat what they have been taught and our text books are re-writes of earlier text books. Perhaps that is the way to pass exams, don't think about what is missing, just repeat what was taught and so it goes on.


Lately I have been looking through some of my old 'how it works' books from my childhood, encyclopedias, atlases and 'online' to see what they say about the Earth's seasons. At least they all agree! It is all down to the tilt of the Earth's axis, the northern hemisphere points towards the Sun in the summer and away from the Sun in winter. Simple! We don't need to know anything more.


A simple experiment: Take a dinner plate and place an apple near the rim with its stalk pointing slightly towards the centre, a model of the tilted Earth. Now slowly and carefully twist the plate on top of a table so as not to disturb the apple until the plate has turned through 180 degrees. Now which way is the apple pointing? Do you still understand the seasons or did you have a book/teacher that really explained it? Perhaps you are a heretic and thought for yourself? Andy Millar raised some of these issues in "You don't need practical skills to be an engineer", 'knowing' how to do something can stop new thinking.


Have a virtual mug of coffee and think about it!
Parents
  • James,

    I think I finally understand your explanation - we all approach things with inbuilt assumptions and I didn't realise you were assuming a non-spinning body while I was assuming spinning. I thinkg the problem is contained in your comment "it doesn't intuitively explain" which really opens up a can of worms. We all rely on an intuitive understanding of issues which are based on assumptions derived from our understanding of the situation. If the situation is slightly different from what we understand, or if our depth of knowledge means our assumptions are different, we can have a completely different intuitive explanation.

    I think that if you want a complete and clear explanation of the seasons and the earth's motion and orientation around the sun you will need to go to someone else as I have already reached the limit of my understanding, or at least my ability to explain my understanding (which, to go back to earlier posts, does not mean it is complete or even correct), so I will slightly paraphrase Andy Millar's earlier comment, "I think it is more complicated than that".

    Regards,

    Alasdair
Reply
  • James,

    I think I finally understand your explanation - we all approach things with inbuilt assumptions and I didn't realise you were assuming a non-spinning body while I was assuming spinning. I thinkg the problem is contained in your comment "it doesn't intuitively explain" which really opens up a can of worms. We all rely on an intuitive understanding of issues which are based on assumptions derived from our understanding of the situation. If the situation is slightly different from what we understand, or if our depth of knowledge means our assumptions are different, we can have a completely different intuitive explanation.

    I think that if you want a complete and clear explanation of the seasons and the earth's motion and orientation around the sun you will need to go to someone else as I have already reached the limit of my understanding, or at least my ability to explain my understanding (which, to go back to earlier posts, does not mean it is complete or even correct), so I will slightly paraphrase Andy Millar's earlier comment, "I think it is more complicated than that".

    Regards,

    Alasdair
Children
No Data