This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Time for licenced Engineers?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
As a result of a discussion within a Linkedin group. I had originally raised the issue of the EC UK or IET legally licencing Engineers and had agreed to bring this discussion from Linkedin to the IET members in an appropriate community for a frank and open debate.

​The circumstances surrounding this discussion was the tragedy of Grenfell Towers and my personal observation that some of the alleged decision makers, had no technical qualifications to make decisions on public safety. I am wondering how far the inquiry will go to reveal that issue. 



As I currently work in Canada we do have an act of law governing the conduct of its licenced Engineers and this makes the Engineer have some higher degree of responsibility for public safety.


​Questions

1)    Given the impact of Grenfell, does EC(UK) have to now start considering licencing? What are the perceived hurdles to achieve this?

​2)    If not. What can we do within our profession to improve pubic safety with an objective to prevent another 'Grenfell' ?


I am ​Interested to get IET members responses.

Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Thanks Moshe. You correctly point out this anomaly in the PE act. But this piece you have provided has some degree of bias. 


    Have a read of this  www.peo.on.ca/.../1.htm as it gives a more objective analysis and the regulators viewpoint.  But you are correct, this clause is widely abused and the regulator wants it struck from the act.
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Thanks Moshe. You correctly point out this anomaly in the PE act. But this piece you have provided has some degree of bias. 


    Have a read of this  www.peo.on.ca/.../1.htm as it gives a more objective analysis and the regulators viewpoint.  But you are correct, this clause is widely abused and the regulator wants it struck from the act.
Children
No Data