This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Time for licenced Engineers?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
As a result of a discussion within a Linkedin group. I had originally raised the issue of the EC UK or IET legally licencing Engineers and had agreed to bring this discussion from Linkedin to the IET members in an appropriate community for a frank and open debate.

​The circumstances surrounding this discussion was the tragedy of Grenfell Towers and my personal observation that some of the alleged decision makers, had no technical qualifications to make decisions on public safety. I am wondering how far the inquiry will go to reveal that issue. 



As I currently work in Canada we do have an act of law governing the conduct of its licenced Engineers and this makes the Engineer have some higher degree of responsibility for public safety.


​Questions

1)    Given the impact of Grenfell, does EC(UK) have to now start considering licencing? What are the perceived hurdles to achieve this?

​2)    If not. What can we do within our profession to improve pubic safety with an objective to prevent another 'Grenfell' ?


I am ​Interested to get IET members responses.

Parents
  • Fascinating test of the legal protection assumed for the term PE, or CEng, etc.


    Whilst one can sympathise for Greg in this case, although it is not clear what would happen if there were a Hadden-Cave analysis of any damage caused by a fault in his design or manufacture caused injury.


    If Arizona law say that an engineer calling himself or herself an engineer needs to be licensed, then the case is clear cut.  The fact that this case is being brought implies a weakness of definitions and is another reason why it is now impossible to protect the term "engineer" her in the UK.


    Please keep us informed of developments.

Reply
  • Fascinating test of the legal protection assumed for the term PE, or CEng, etc.


    Whilst one can sympathise for Greg in this case, although it is not clear what would happen if there were a Hadden-Cave analysis of any damage caused by a fault in his design or manufacture caused injury.


    If Arizona law say that an engineer calling himself or herself an engineer needs to be licensed, then the case is clear cut.  The fact that this case is being brought implies a weakness of definitions and is another reason why it is now impossible to protect the term "engineer" her in the UK.


    Please keep us informed of developments.

Children
No Data