This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

STEM Education - should it focus on technology itself, or on using technology to solve problems?

Just been listening to Eben Upton discussing how he came up with Raspberry Pi (good programme, worth a listen):

www.bbc.co.uk/.../b09ly60f


Took me back to my university years ('79-'82) when many of my cohort were playing with Sinclair micros etc, and I was thinking about why it never appealed to me. I think it's because while I do, obviously, find the development of new technology fascinating, what interests me is its ability to solve problems - whereas many of my colleagues were interested in the pure challenge of getting these piles of vaguely connected circuit boards to just work!


Now, I believe it's a Good Thing that there are young people who are fascinated with technology for its own sake, this is how the Microsofts and Apples of this world developed. But I do wonder if we focus enough in STEM education on the ability of technology to solve problems, and develop an interest in its possibilities from that direction? Two reasons:
  1. I suggest it will attract more people into the fold, and increase the general understanding of the value (actual and potential) of technology,

  • A good development and implementation team needs a wide range of skills (c.f. Belbin team roles), I suggest this approach would help us flesh out these teams with people who are able to form the link between the potential of technology and the needs of society (or the customer depending on your focus smiley).


(Also, it is often suggested that there is a sex bias here: boys tending to be more interested in just building things (and blowing them up!), girls tending to be more interested in why they're doing it. Personally I think this is, if anything, a gender issue rather than a sex issue and hence is terribly complicated - possibly best just to accept that different approaches appeal to different people?)


What are people's experience here? Do you think we explain enough what technology is for, and inspire young people to use it solve problems? Or - if we do we get too carried away with bells and whistles - is that maybe the right approach at a young age? Any good stories?


I'm very happy to admit that my big inspiration (in hindsight) was watching Thunderbirds as a very young child! I still have a little Thunderbird 2 on my desk to inspire me. Oh, and don't worry, I will still (much to the amusement of my family) sit with a huge smile on my face looking at a very elegent piece of engineering for its own sake. But it's got to be really elegent!


Cheers,


Andy


Parents
  • There has to be some notion of what's both pratical and practicable when asking students to solve a problem and therefore the problem has be sufficiently challenging, but solvable with the science, technology, engineering and math concepts collectively known by the students on a team.  Is not the goal to get students to apply their knowledge of science, technology, engineering and math to come up with a solution that is both pratical (useful) and practicable (feasible).  Elements of the solution may use scientific theories, engineering principles, mathematical concepts, available technologies, and/or general knowledge available to the team.  The focus on technology is dependant on the nature of the challenge, but should be weighted to the practical and practicable application of the technology to solve the problem at hand.  To illustrate, if the challenge is to maxmise the flight tme of a paper glider, the students would need to understand how to use paper technology by folding it or cutting it to maximise lift and reduce weight, but not how paper is made or all its uses and applications.
Reply
  • There has to be some notion of what's both pratical and practicable when asking students to solve a problem and therefore the problem has be sufficiently challenging, but solvable with the science, technology, engineering and math concepts collectively known by the students on a team.  Is not the goal to get students to apply their knowledge of science, technology, engineering and math to come up with a solution that is both pratical (useful) and practicable (feasible).  Elements of the solution may use scientific theories, engineering principles, mathematical concepts, available technologies, and/or general knowledge available to the team.  The focus on technology is dependant on the nature of the challenge, but should be weighted to the practical and practicable application of the technology to solve the problem at hand.  To illustrate, if the challenge is to maxmise the flight tme of a paper glider, the students would need to understand how to use paper technology by folding it or cutting it to maximise lift and reduce weight, but not how paper is made or all its uses and applications.
Children
No Data