This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EUR ING Application via 5.4b Special Cases

Hi All,

I had read through the EUR ING application guide and found on section 5.4b Special Cases as below:


"There are cases where the professional engineering performance required for registration has been developed on the basis of a type of education not covered by 5.3 and 5.4a). This case also applies for applicants whose education took place in the FEANI area (=FEANI member countries) but with programmes that are not listed in the FEANI INDEX. Nevertheless it is possible to consider such alternative routes. Very strict procedures, however, have then to be followed, (see 7.1), and the applicant must have at least 15 years of Professional Engineering Experience recognized by FEANI: 15E"

https://www.feani.org/sites/default/files/Guide_to_the_Register_FINAL_approved_GA_2013.pdf


Based on the above, possible for an IEng with more than 15 years of professional engineering experience to apply for this route? If yes, why EC / IET never promote this route for senior IEng?


Like to hear other opinion regarding this?


Thanks,
Parents

  • Mehmood Birdi:

    4. Have you considered that you might be just as well (or more) clever, educated, and experienced enough to represent yourself, without asking for approval from others, and their rules and regulations?




    Great question...


    I'm quite comfortable with who I am... and I don't (as a rule) use pre- or post-nomials except where they are relevant!


    However, other people - especially Regulators and Assessors, but not forgetting HR peeps - like to know that I know what I'm talking about, and there are certain benchmarks that are now accepted as indicators of Competence.  Holding those credentials helps with my job.


    Someone with no pre- or post-nominals is not necessarily less-qualified than someone with loads of them... they may simply be choosing not to show them! 

Reply

  • Mehmood Birdi:

    4. Have you considered that you might be just as well (or more) clever, educated, and experienced enough to represent yourself, without asking for approval from others, and their rules and regulations?




    Great question...


    I'm quite comfortable with who I am... and I don't (as a rule) use pre- or post-nomials except where they are relevant!


    However, other people - especially Regulators and Assessors, but not forgetting HR peeps - like to know that I know what I'm talking about, and there are certain benchmarks that are now accepted as indicators of Competence.  Holding those credentials helps with my job.


    Someone with no pre- or post-nominals is not necessarily less-qualified than someone with loads of them... they may simply be choosing not to show them! 

Children
No Data