Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 54 replies
  • Subscribers 9 subscribers
  • Views 1313 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EC UK Quality Assurance Committee on CPD requirement

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

Quality Assurance Committee on CPD requirement



Published: 01/11/2018

 



All Engineering Council registrants are committed to maintaining and enhancing their competence, which means undertaking Continuing Professional Development (CPD).

From 1 January 2019, licensed members will be required to sample their registrants’ CPD and sampling activity will become part of the licence review process.
Professionally active registrants who persistently do not respond to or engage with requests for CPD records from their institution risk removal from the Engineering Council Register.


Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Moshe Waserman:
    Quality Assurance Committee on CPD requirement



    Published: 01/11/2018

    Professionally active registrants who persistently do not respond to or engage with requests for CPD records from their institution risk removal from the Engineering Council Register.




    That's like saying British citizens who are actively employed will be required to pay their taxes or risk removal of their citizenship. Which that would imply that retired and unemployed citizens - receiving benefits - will not be affected.


    Given the current fiasco with trying to obtain a Brexit deal with the EU, those in the EC - who came up with the above statement - should be recruited onto the UK government negotiating team. The level of BS would be highly appreciated by the PM. wink


    Getting back to the EU statement, registrants who are not actively engaged in a technical role, such as management, administrative related, or are retired, simply have to notify the IET of this and their registration will be safe. The EC only wants to punish those who are in technical roles. smiley

Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Moshe Waserman:
    Quality Assurance Committee on CPD requirement



    Published: 01/11/2018

    Professionally active registrants who persistently do not respond to or engage with requests for CPD records from their institution risk removal from the Engineering Council Register.




    That's like saying British citizens who are actively employed will be required to pay their taxes or risk removal of their citizenship. Which that would imply that retired and unemployed citizens - receiving benefits - will not be affected.


    Given the current fiasco with trying to obtain a Brexit deal with the EU, those in the EC - who came up with the above statement - should be recruited onto the UK government negotiating team. The level of BS would be highly appreciated by the PM. wink


    Getting back to the EU statement, registrants who are not actively engaged in a technical role, such as management, administrative related, or are retired, simply have to notify the IET of this and their registration will be safe. The EC only wants to punish those who are in technical roles. smiley

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines