This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Is technology killing the NHS?

I'm sorry if this comes across as pessimistic but I believe that the NHS will die unless seriously intelligent reforms are made to it. These reforms will probably not be possible because of inertia in the system. What happened to Stafford Hospital is a snapshot of what will come to other NHS trusts.


When the NHS was established in the 1940s, technology in hospitals was far simpler. In many cases medical procedures were carried out using simple hand tools. The most complicated piece of equipment in a hospital was probably an X-Ray machine. A modern hospital contains tens of thousands of pieces of advanced machinery.


This costs a large amount of money to buy.

This costs a large amount of money to maintain and service.

This costs a large amount of money to provide staff training.


The amount of money spent by hospitals on advanced medical devices and IT equipment keeps increasing year after year and is a substantial part of the NHS budget.


If this isn't bad enough in itself, the NHS is not very good when it comes to using and deploying technology due to its cumbersome and antiquated management structure along with the mentality of a high proportion of its staff. The NHS is clearly not a visionary and progressive organisation.


Only a small fraction of medical devices are specifically designed for the NHS. A high proportion of them are off the shelf products primarily designed for the US healthcare market.


The situation is marginally better with software although NHS IT projects are known to have been expensive disasters.


Therefore, is technology killing the NHS?
Parents

  • Paul Gruszka:


    Anybody with any sense could see it was a bad idea especially when administration was not the problem it just added a big cost load on the NHS that did not improve patient care.

    There is much truth to what you say about the rise in administration staff and middle management since 1979, and its resulting cost load on the NHS that did not filter through to providing improved service for patients. One problem that the NHS faces is the amount of time and effort spend on ass covering, in order to avoid litigation, as opposed to providing frontline services. This is incredibly draining of resources. Information I have from a medical engineering department of a hospital is that even individual techs must first and foremost cover their ass before providing frontline services.

    My view is Thatcher was lobbied by private medicine to destroy the NHS and she wanted to get rid of the cost from the government pockets.

    This is entering the realm of conspiracy theories but I personally believe that the NHS has been deliberately downgraded at the behest of private medicine in order to create room in the market for private medical service providers, but blaming Thatcher is simple and disingenuous as higher order forces in the EU and the WTO have also played their part, although I don't have much information about them to hand.

    If I was in control of the NHS I would implement your vertical integration by giving all the administration the boot, put the nursing staff back in control, get GCHQ to set up a secure IT system under the direction of the nursing staff and of course set up a government R & D department that was not a closed shop to alternative treatments other than drugs.

    Whenever I have mentioned the concept of vertical integration in order to reduce costs (ultimately to the taxpayer) and ensure that medical devices meed the requirements of the NHS and its patients I have been accused of socialism. Although I try to explain that vertical integration and socialism are two different things (for a start I'm not in favour of banning private medicine; private companies manufacturing medical devices; or the NHS buying medical devices from private companies so long as they meet the requirements and the price is right) my arguments often fail to convince.


    Also, why should nursing staff be put back into control? Why not have engineers in control instead?
    It will never happen so it is down to engineers to create the Electrotherapy devices that I know can cure any pathogen based disease and shake up the whole system up.

    There is a problem whether it would be legal to sell certain medical devices to the public for home / self treatment.


    I'm in favour of genetic modification of humans as this will add a completely new dimension into medicine. I believe that two countries already are using it commercially to create 'superhumans' with desirable genetic traits. There are times when I think that conventional medicine has reached the end of the road and that NHS hospitals have the potential of becoming dinosaurs of the 20th century like coal fired power stations in the 21st century.
Reply

  • Paul Gruszka:


    Anybody with any sense could see it was a bad idea especially when administration was not the problem it just added a big cost load on the NHS that did not improve patient care.

    There is much truth to what you say about the rise in administration staff and middle management since 1979, and its resulting cost load on the NHS that did not filter through to providing improved service for patients. One problem that the NHS faces is the amount of time and effort spend on ass covering, in order to avoid litigation, as opposed to providing frontline services. This is incredibly draining of resources. Information I have from a medical engineering department of a hospital is that even individual techs must first and foremost cover their ass before providing frontline services.

    My view is Thatcher was lobbied by private medicine to destroy the NHS and she wanted to get rid of the cost from the government pockets.

    This is entering the realm of conspiracy theories but I personally believe that the NHS has been deliberately downgraded at the behest of private medicine in order to create room in the market for private medical service providers, but blaming Thatcher is simple and disingenuous as higher order forces in the EU and the WTO have also played their part, although I don't have much information about them to hand.

    If I was in control of the NHS I would implement your vertical integration by giving all the administration the boot, put the nursing staff back in control, get GCHQ to set up a secure IT system under the direction of the nursing staff and of course set up a government R & D department that was not a closed shop to alternative treatments other than drugs.

    Whenever I have mentioned the concept of vertical integration in order to reduce costs (ultimately to the taxpayer) and ensure that medical devices meed the requirements of the NHS and its patients I have been accused of socialism. Although I try to explain that vertical integration and socialism are two different things (for a start I'm not in favour of banning private medicine; private companies manufacturing medical devices; or the NHS buying medical devices from private companies so long as they meet the requirements and the price is right) my arguments often fail to convince.


    Also, why should nursing staff be put back into control? Why not have engineers in control instead?
    It will never happen so it is down to engineers to create the Electrotherapy devices that I know can cure any pathogen based disease and shake up the whole system up.

    There is a problem whether it would be legal to sell certain medical devices to the public for home / self treatment.


    I'm in favour of genetic modification of humans as this will add a completely new dimension into medicine. I believe that two countries already are using it commercially to create 'superhumans' with desirable genetic traits. There are times when I think that conventional medicine has reached the end of the road and that NHS hospitals have the potential of becoming dinosaurs of the 20th century like coal fired power stations in the 21st century.
Children
No Data