This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

LED Tubes

I have two 36W 1.2m Fluorescent tubes (with starters) lighting my workshop. After 8 years plus I feel that the light output is droping (It could also be my eyes getting older). I would like to replace them with LED tubes so I went to a local store for a look. They offered normal fluorescent tubes with a claimed light output of 3000ish Lumens and LED tubes with a claimed output of 1500ish Lumens. Are the LED tubes really that much dimmer or is it a measurement thing where the normal tubes are omnidirectional and the LED tubes only shine in one direction?

Can anyone recomend particular brands or systems for replacement tubes or would I be better off replacing the complete fittings? Anything else I should know?


Best regards


Roger
Parents
  • Yes, this is broadly in line with my observations of the market. LED lamps have a great future in their own right, but they do not fare well as plug-in replacements.  Mercury fluorescent tubes have been around for a while now, but still compare favourably on efficiency and can be classed as "energy saving". (Oldie but goody!  Like lead-acid batteries, which we have discussed recently)


    I was considering LED tubes as plug-in replacement for mercury-fluorescent for various places but found that a 1·5 m (5 ft) LED tube has a claimed output of circa 3 000 lumens (about the same as a 1·2 m (4 ft) mercury fluorescent in fact) against circa 4 500 for a mercury fluorescent 58 W tube. So if you do a straight replacement to LED tube, you will certainly save electricity but I think you will be disappointed with the light output. The LED tubes will be more directional in light output but I don't think this will compensate.


    Fluorescent tube light output does drop off as the tube ages. You could simply replace the tubes with new mercury fluorescent. Or even replace the fittings with 1·5 m (5 ft) ones. The fittings usually have mercury fluorescent tube included, so you would enjoy lots of light.


    Digressing slightly, I have been making some similar comparisons of MR16 halogen reflector lamps, and their LED GU10 plug-in replacements. Watch this space!
Reply
  • Yes, this is broadly in line with my observations of the market. LED lamps have a great future in their own right, but they do not fare well as plug-in replacements.  Mercury fluorescent tubes have been around for a while now, but still compare favourably on efficiency and can be classed as "energy saving". (Oldie but goody!  Like lead-acid batteries, which we have discussed recently)


    I was considering LED tubes as plug-in replacement for mercury-fluorescent for various places but found that a 1·5 m (5 ft) LED tube has a claimed output of circa 3 000 lumens (about the same as a 1·2 m (4 ft) mercury fluorescent in fact) against circa 4 500 for a mercury fluorescent 58 W tube. So if you do a straight replacement to LED tube, you will certainly save electricity but I think you will be disappointed with the light output. The LED tubes will be more directional in light output but I don't think this will compensate.


    Fluorescent tube light output does drop off as the tube ages. You could simply replace the tubes with new mercury fluorescent. Or even replace the fittings with 1·5 m (5 ft) ones. The fittings usually have mercury fluorescent tube included, so you would enjoy lots of light.


    Digressing slightly, I have been making some similar comparisons of MR16 halogen reflector lamps, and their LED GU10 plug-in replacements. Watch this space!
Children
No Data