This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

No Climate Emergency

This doesn't seem to appear in the Daily Mail or the BBC, I wonder why:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/29/scientists-tell-un-global-climate-summit-no-emerge/

There is no climate emergency
A global network of 500 scientists and professionals has prepared this urgent message. Climate
science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should
openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while
politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation
to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming
The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with
natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no
surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted
The world has warmed at less than half the originally-predicted rate, and at less than half the rate to
be expected on the basis of net anthropogenic forcing and radiative imbalance. It tells us that we are
far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. Moreover,
they most likely exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the
fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is
beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global
plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters
There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and
suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, CO2-mitigation measures are as
damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines kill birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations
destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly
oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches
emerge, we will have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to
provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world.

https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ecd-letter-to-un.pdf


At last some people talking sense. After the relatively rapid rise of around 1°C between 1975 and 2000 in the Northern Hemisphere the temperatures have been relatively flat.

f95f77dc1ad4c0ab15046a656ee22cae-huge-hadcrut.jpg

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/figures/Figure11.png


We certainly need to reduce our consumption of finite resources and reduce our impact on the planet but focusing on CO2 is not the way to do it. Let's start with real pollutants that are directly harmful.


Best regards


Roger
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Malcolm Davies:

    As per the words of Max Ehrmann's Poem, penned in 1920, called Desiderata (Things desired) in the sixth stanza he writes as follows: "You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars: you have a right to be here. And whether it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should"  I am confident that our Earth is following the same grand scheme, albeit apparently somewhat analytically 'chaotic' and unpredictable - at least in the short term. Therefore, if the Earth is indeed largely a self regulating system (e.g. as per the writings of James Lovelock et al), then whatever happens to our global climate in each 100 year period of study (say) is largely way beyond human control. Our Sun has sun spot cycles with both 11 and 33 year periodicity that have a major impact on our climate and with these and other phenomena such as irregular Coronal Mass Ejections that occasionally are directed towards our planet, we can see that natural, global timescales are inherent to the system and at least an order of magnitude greater than the lifetime of any political party in Government.


    Clearly we need to properly identify those things we can control, such as food supply, air polution, water quality, the release of plastic and other waste into our envronments, plus the control of the spread of disease etc whilst accepting that there are other things that are way beyond our control. Engineers ans Scientists know, from first hand experience, that mathematical models of any system are only useful over a limited range of values and so it is with climate forecasting and the supposed influence of green house gasses etc on our climate system. Therefore we must be prepared to adopt radical behavioural change, to surrender our lovely motor cars whether ICE, Hybrid, Hydrogen or BEV, give up the hour long cummutes to and from 'work' in order to simply sit in front of a remote centralised office suite of VDUs each day, take to our feet, 'get on our bikes' and create and use effective local transport systems and by so doing, enjoy the socio-economic benefits of much improved respiratory and cardio vascular health as a result. 


    Greta T may not have realised that she needs to petition the Sun to get the level of control she insists is within our greedy grasping hands. Good luck with that young lady!     


    Thank you Malcom for your support but I have now decided to reduce drastically my presence in this Forum and continue  managing only my Blog where I can have a full freedom of expression- someone warned me that I' m out of  place there! Good luck to everyone!

    My Blog:
    https://professionalengineeringukandothertopics.wordpress.com/




     

Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Malcolm Davies:

    As per the words of Max Ehrmann's Poem, penned in 1920, called Desiderata (Things desired) in the sixth stanza he writes as follows: "You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars: you have a right to be here. And whether it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should"  I am confident that our Earth is following the same grand scheme, albeit apparently somewhat analytically 'chaotic' and unpredictable - at least in the short term. Therefore, if the Earth is indeed largely a self regulating system (e.g. as per the writings of James Lovelock et al), then whatever happens to our global climate in each 100 year period of study (say) is largely way beyond human control. Our Sun has sun spot cycles with both 11 and 33 year periodicity that have a major impact on our climate and with these and other phenomena such as irregular Coronal Mass Ejections that occasionally are directed towards our planet, we can see that natural, global timescales are inherent to the system and at least an order of magnitude greater than the lifetime of any political party in Government.


    Clearly we need to properly identify those things we can control, such as food supply, air polution, water quality, the release of plastic and other waste into our envronments, plus the control of the spread of disease etc whilst accepting that there are other things that are way beyond our control. Engineers ans Scientists know, from first hand experience, that mathematical models of any system are only useful over a limited range of values and so it is with climate forecasting and the supposed influence of green house gasses etc on our climate system. Therefore we must be prepared to adopt radical behavioural change, to surrender our lovely motor cars whether ICE, Hybrid, Hydrogen or BEV, give up the hour long cummutes to and from 'work' in order to simply sit in front of a remote centralised office suite of VDUs each day, take to our feet, 'get on our bikes' and create and use effective local transport systems and by so doing, enjoy the socio-economic benefits of much improved respiratory and cardio vascular health as a result. 


    Greta T may not have realised that she needs to petition the Sun to get the level of control she insists is within our greedy grasping hands. Good luck with that young lady!     


    Thank you Malcom for your support but I have now decided to reduce drastically my presence in this Forum and continue  managing only my Blog where I can have a full freedom of expression- someone warned me that I' m out of  place there! Good luck to everyone!

    My Blog:
    https://professionalengineeringukandothertopics.wordpress.com/




     

Children
No Data