This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Should non-payment of a mobile phone bill be a criminal offence?

It used to be known as abstraction of electricity on a landline telephone network but it might be better referred to as abstraction of EM waves or photons, depending on how you view the wave particle duality, on a mobile network.


A friend racked up a mobile phone bill of nearly £2000 as a result of exceeding his data allowance whilst abroad back in 2017. He changed his network provider then cancelled the direct debit resulting in this bill going unpaid to today. It's not actually illegal to do this as all the old network provider can do is demand the payment, as a civil matter, and ruin his credit rating. He claims that unlike an unpaid gas or electricity bill, an unpaid phone bill has not consumed any of the earth's precious natural resources apart from a bit of electricity that cost only a tiny fraction of the value of the bill.


A local bobby disagrees and says that theft is theft regardless of whether it's a tangible object or a non-tangible service, so the criminal should be brought to justice and jailed.


Does the IET have a position regarding the legal status of unpaid phone bills and whether or not refusal to pay should be a criminal offence?
Parents

  • Sparkingchip:

    I remember some people were fined when WiFi first came about for standing in the street and using other people’s and businesses WiFi.



    However, if you're broadcasting your wifi to the public (i.e. making it accessible and password free) then how is someone supposed to know that by using it they are breaking the law?


    I used to be a BT customer (until they made a complete hash job of connecting a line in to my new house when I moved but that's another, and very long, story...) and if I allowed my Wifi network (or a certain proportion of bandwith) to be accessible to the public then it allowed me to use other BT customers 'public' wifi bandwith when I was out and about. 


    I also set up my friends business wifi so that customers could connect to the business wifi without a password but only use a maximum of 10% of the bandwith whereas staff (password protected access) use the larger proportion. Luckily the public wifi signal doesn't extend beyond the gates at the front of the building so cannot be connected to by anyone not actually inside. ? If it did extend beyond the gates then I'd password protect the service too.
Reply

  • Sparkingchip:

    I remember some people were fined when WiFi first came about for standing in the street and using other people’s and businesses WiFi.



    However, if you're broadcasting your wifi to the public (i.e. making it accessible and password free) then how is someone supposed to know that by using it they are breaking the law?


    I used to be a BT customer (until they made a complete hash job of connecting a line in to my new house when I moved but that's another, and very long, story...) and if I allowed my Wifi network (or a certain proportion of bandwith) to be accessible to the public then it allowed me to use other BT customers 'public' wifi bandwith when I was out and about. 


    I also set up my friends business wifi so that customers could connect to the business wifi without a password but only use a maximum of 10% of the bandwith whereas staff (password protected access) use the larger proportion. Luckily the public wifi signal doesn't extend beyond the gates at the front of the building so cannot be connected to by anyone not actually inside. ? If it did extend beyond the gates then I'd password protect the service too.
Children
No Data